About Us

We work collaboratively with our clients to build strong, sustainable relationships. Our team is committed to delivering consistent high standards of service, and we understand the importance of accessibility. Working with us, you'll enjoy open communication, meaning well scoped, properly resourced and effectively managed matters.

Learn More

Latest Case

Providing strategic advice on expansion structures November 16, 2018

Founded in Bondi Beach in 2012, Bailey Nelson has rapidly grown into a global eyewear retailer and service provider with boutiques in Australia, London, Canada and New Zealand. The strong demand for their products and … Continued

Latest News

Maddocks appoints restructuring and insolvency partner in Sydney January 14, 2019

Monday 14 January  Maddocks has appointed its second new partner in a month with the appointment of Danielle Funston. Danielle is a restructuring and insolvency lawyer who advises clients on recoveries, liquidations, corporate restructuring and … Continued

Latest Article

Made in Australia: Tightened restrictions on the use of country of origin labels January 14, 2019

The recent decision of Nature’s Care Manufacture Pty Ltd v Australian Made Campaign Limited by the Federal Court of Australia has provided much needed guidance on the requirements for ‘Made in Australia’ and other country … Continued

Medibank cleared of all ACCC allegations

Over the past 18 months The Prescription has commented on the ACCC’s strategic focus on the private health insurance sector and, in particular, the issue of communicating detrimental changes to policy holders.

A key aspect of the ACCC’s approach to the private health insurance sector has been a proposition that – from the perspective of the consumer – there is no distinction between a change in benefits because of a rule change and a change in benefits because of a change in underlying contracting arrangements with providers.  That proposition was dealt a significant blow by the Federal Court yesterday, with the dismissal of the ACCC’s proceedings against Medibank alleging misleading and deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct.  The Federal Court rejected the ACCC’s proposition, readily drawing a distinction between a change in benefits arising from a rule change and a change in benefits due to a change in underlying contractual arrangements.

Our commentary on the outcome of the Medibank proceedings is available here.

 

Author:   
Aaron Kloczko 2cm colour 300ppi 2013 jpg Aaron Kloczko
Partner
61 2 9291 6231
aaron.kloczko@maddocks.com.au

Over the past 18 months The Prescription has commented on the ACCC’s strategic focus on the private health insurance sector and, in particular, the issue of communicating detrimental changes to policy holders.

A key aspect of the ACCC’s approach to the private health insurance sector has been a proposition that – from the perspective of the consumer – there is no distinction between a change in benefits because of a rule change and a change in benefits because of a change in underlying contracting arrangements with providers.  That proposition was dealt a significant blow by the Federal Court yesterday, with the dismissal of the ACCC’s proceedings against Medibank alleging misleading and deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct.  The Federal Court rejected the ACCC’s proposition, readily drawing a distinction between a change in benefits arising from a rule change and a change in benefits due to a change in underlying contractual arrangements.

Our commentary on the outcome of the Medibank proceedings is available here.

 

Author:   
Aaron Kloczko 2cm colour 300ppi 2013 jpg Aaron Kloczko
Partner
61 2 9291 6231
aaron.kloczko@maddocks.com.au