About Us

We work collaboratively with our clients to build strong, sustainable relationships. Our team is committed to delivering consistent high standards of service, and we understand the importance of accessibility. Working with us, you'll enjoy open communication, meaning well scoped, properly resourced and effectively managed matters.

Learn More

Latest Case

Advising global cryptocurrency exchange operators on entry into Australian market July 31, 2018

The rise in popularity and demand for cryptocurrency trading has resulted in a number of cryptocurrency exchange operators expanding into different countries, including Australia, to create a global brand. In Australia, new laws and regulations … Continued

Latest News

Maddocks advises French firm on major construction company acquisition August 6, 2018

Monday 6 August 2018 Law firm Maddocks recently advised French firm Bouygues Construction on its acquisition of leading Australian construction and fitout business AW Edwards. The acquisition is a key part of Bouygues’ continued expansion … Continued

Latest Article

Do your construction documents conform with the new Ministerial Directions and Instructions for Public Construction Procurement? August 15, 2018

Are you a state government department or public body which procures public construction works and services? Are you in the process of determining which form of contract will be most appropriate for your procurement to issue … Continued

Chairs and boards come under greater pressure to understand tax liabilities

22 August 2011: The chairs and boards of big businesses have been put on notice that they could face serious consequences if they fail to fully understand their company’s tax liabilities with the introduction of the ATO’s new Reportable Tax Position Schedule.

Following the controversial Centro Federal Court ruling earlier this year it is now clear board directors must fully understand all the decisions they make even if the issue is outside their area of expertise

Chris Kinsella, a partner in Maddocks Tax Controversy group, says there has never been greater scrutiny by the ATO, shareholders and the courts on Board decisions and their oversight role.

“With the introduction of RTP schedules from July this year, board members will now be under greater pressure to be fully aware of the impact of their organisation’s tax risks and liabilities on share prices and tax obligations.

“Failure by board members to understand this detail and allow RTP schedules to be returned to the ATO  without proper  disclosure could  see their businesses exposed to potentially severe  sanctions and the directors potentially exposed  to personal litigation,” Mr Kinsella said.

The new RTP schedule requires  businesses to disclose  forensic detail on a company’s potential tax exposures to the ATO and will accelerate the need for boards and senior management to ascertain the risks associated with uncertain tax positions.

The ATO has indicated that the RTP schedule will initially only be directed to taxpayers seen by the ATO  as ‘higher risk’ or as ‘key taxpayers’.

Mr Kinsella said the ATO’s focus on corporate tax risk and tax risk governance will force companies and their directors to identify soft spots in tax positions.

“The Commissioner’s move toward a more imposing approach to compliance and the introduction of the RTP Schedule is a red flag on the landscape of Australian tax law.

“From now on businesses and their Boards need to be prepared to address and justify an uncertain tax position at an early stage.”

22 August 2011: The chairs and boards of big businesses have been put on notice that they could face serious consequences if they fail to fully understand their company’s tax liabilities with the introduction of the ATO’s new Reportable Tax Position Schedule.

Following the controversial Centro Federal Court ruling earlier this year it is now clear board directors must fully understand all the decisions they make even if the issue is outside their area of expertise

Chris Kinsella, a partner in Maddocks Tax Controversy group, says there has never been greater scrutiny by the ATO, shareholders and the courts on Board decisions and their oversight role.

“With the introduction of RTP schedules from July this year, board members will now be under greater pressure to be fully aware of the impact of their organisation’s tax risks and liabilities on share prices and tax obligations.

“Failure by board members to understand this detail and allow RTP schedules to be returned to the ATO  without proper  disclosure could  see their businesses exposed to potentially severe  sanctions and the directors potentially exposed  to personal litigation,” Mr Kinsella said.

The new RTP schedule requires  businesses to disclose  forensic detail on a company’s potential tax exposures to the ATO and will accelerate the need for boards and senior management to ascertain the risks associated with uncertain tax positions.

The ATO has indicated that the RTP schedule will initially only be directed to taxpayers seen by the ATO  as ‘higher risk’ or as ‘key taxpayers’.

Mr Kinsella said the ATO’s focus on corporate tax risk and tax risk governance will force companies and their directors to identify soft spots in tax positions.

“The Commissioner’s move toward a more imposing approach to compliance and the introduction of the RTP Schedule is a red flag on the landscape of Australian tax law.

“From now on businesses and their Boards need to be prepared to address and justify an uncertain tax position at an early stage.”