Introduction of Amendment C270, built form controls
The Victorian Government formalised planning controls under Amendment C270 in the Melbourne Planning Scheme
On 23 November 2016, the Victorian Government formalised planning controls under Amendment C270 in the Melbourne Planning Scheme.
The controls replace the interim mandatory built form controls that were introduced in September 2015.
The Amendment applies to land generally within the Hoddle Grid and Southbank (the Central City).
The Amendment affects two types of development areas:
- General Development Areas (DDO10) – the focus is on growth and more intensive development and is primarily where towers can be located
- Special Character Areas (DDO2, DDO40, DDO60 and DDO62) – the focus is to protect specific valued attributes, including a lower built form scale appropriate for each area.
The new provisions seek to improve public amenity and ensure development enhances Melbourne’s long-term liveability. This is considered to be particularly important in the context of rapid increases in the quantity, density and scale of developments within the central city of Melbourne.
The key changes introduced under Amendment C270 are as follows:
|Planning control||Detail||Difference between interim measure|
|Floor Area Ratio||For land to which the DDO10 applies, the Floor Area Ratio is set at 18:1, with a greater Floor Area Ratio triggering a floor area uplift mechanism.|
The application must be accompanied by an assessment and report of the proposed floor area ratio from an independent quantity surveyor.
|This is a reduction from the Floor Area Ratio in the interim controls (24:1).|
|Floor Area Uplift Mechanism||A permit applicant may exceed the 18:1 Floor Area Ratio, provided:|
If the proposed floor area ratio exceeds 18:1, the application must include details of the public benefit to be provided. The responsible authority must consider the extent to which the floor area ratio exceeding 18:1 will deliver a public benefit.
|Under the interim controls, a permit applicant could only exceed the 24:1 site plot ratio if it could demonstrate the buildings and works would be consistent with the Design Objectives and Built Form Outcomes of Schedule 10 to the Overlay and any local planning policy requirements.|
|Public benefit for Floor Area Uplift||For the purposes of an application for a Floor Area Uplift, categories of ‘public benefit’ are as follows:|
The value of any Floor Area Uplift is measured as 10 percent of the gross realisation value per square metre (GRV/m²) for all additional floor area above the allowable 18:1 floor area ratio.
The GRV/m² depends on the corresponding use(s) and the precinct in which the development is located.
|As above, the Floor Area Uplift mechanism under the interim controls did not specify categories of ‘public benefit’.|
|Overshadowing||Where buildings will cast any additional shadow across certain spaces listed in the DDO2 during the hours and dates specified, a permit must not be granted. There has been an introduction of new spaces and extended dates and times of protection.|
The protected areas under this amendment include Federation Square, City Square, the State Library Forecourt, Bourke Street Mall south of tram tracks and ‘any public space, public parks and gardens, public squares, major pedestrian routes including street and lanes, open spaces associated with a place of worship and privately owned public spaces accessible to the public’.
|Under the interim controls, the prohibition on overshadowing applied only to the north bank of the Yarra, the Shrine of Remembrance, Federation Square, City Square and the State Library Forecourt. The number of locations has been increased under Amendment 270.|
Similarly, the relevant time period under which the interim controls prohibited buildings casting additional shadow was generally smaller.
|Height||Preferred street wall height should not exceed 20 metres.|
This can be modified to 40 metres if necessary to be consistent with surrounding street wall heights or 80 metres on street corners or fronting some public spaces.
|The interim controls restricted ‘podium heights’ to 40 metres.|
If the building exceeds 80 metres, a minimum side and rear setback of 6 percent of towers height is required.
|The Upper level street setback under the interim controls was the same as it is in Amendment C270 (minimum of five metres).|
The interim controls did not distinguish between side and rear boundaries. For buildings up to or equal to 100 metres, a minimum tower setback of five metres from all boundaries or from the centre of the laneway above the podium was required.
For buildings above 100 metres, a minimum tower setback from all boundaries and from the centre of the laneway above the podium of five percent of the overall building height was required.
|Tower separation||A separation distance for multiple towers within a large site of six percent of the combined tower height of the adjacent towers.||As above, under the interim controls, a setback of five percent of the overall building height was required for buildings over 100 metres.|
|Wind effects||In respect of buildings and works with a total building height in excess of 40 metres, a permit:|
in publicly accessible areas within a distance equal to twice the longest width of the building measured for all facades.
An application for a permit for a building with a total building height in excess of 40 metres must be accompanied by a wind analysis report.
|The test under the interim controls was expressed differently to Amendment C270. Under the interim controls, an application for a permit must have been accompanied by a wind analysis report demonstrating the development was designed to be generally acceptable for stationary long term wind exposure and did not rely on street trees for wind protection.|
To view Amendment C270, click here.
The planning controls apply to applications received on or after 23 November 2016.
Homebuyers, Housing Affordability and the Federal Election – What Developers need to know
By Nick Sparks & Lachlan Peavey
We summarise the incentives and concessions on offer for developers from both major parties ahead of the Election.
The importance of marketing – developer liable for misleading and deceptive conduct
We outline the impacts of a case where a developer had deceived purchasers by marketing an off-the-plan development...
Probuild and beyond: Insolvency issues for construction projects
By Sam Kingston
This article gives a high level summary of the issues that commonly arise and some relevant considerations.
Planning reform in Victoria – What is the current state of play?
By Guest Contributor, Eleni Roussos | Director, Urbis
Eleni Roussos, Director at Urbis, looks at the current state of play and what planning reforms will survive.