FIRB changes - Australian land corporations
Australia's foreign investment rules have been rewritten
The Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Legislation Amendment Act 2015 (Cth) (Act) received Royal Assent on 25 November 2015 and the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Regulation 2015 (Regulation) was approved on 26 November 2015.
As we have previously written, these constitute an almost complete rewrite of Australia's foreign investment regime.
One of the main changes to the previous Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (Cth) (Old Act) is the impact on the concept of an 'Australian land corporation' (previously called an 'Australian Urban Land Corporation' under the Old Act). An Australian land corporation is generally a corporation where the value of its interests in Australian land exceeds 50 percent of the value of its total assets.
An acquisition of an interest in a share in an Australian land corporation is generally a notifiable action under the Act with a zero threshold value. This means the acquisition of a single share in an Australian land corporation could require notification to the Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) unless an exemption applies.
Exemptions from zero threshold
Some of the exemptions are new and provide a solution to the practical difficulties parties have encountered in the past.
The exemptions from the zero threshold limit are:
Less than 10 percent residential land & vacant commercial land
For land held by an Australian land corporation, the total value of interests in residential land (based on a reasonable assessment), and commercial land that is vacant, is less than 10 percent of the value of the total assets of the corporation.
Less than 10 percent interest in the Australian land corporation
All of the following apply:
- the Australian land corporation is or will be listed for quotation in the official list of a stock exchange (whether or not in Australia). A foreign company may be an Australian land corporation where its interest in Australian land (eg. through the holding of shares in an Australian land corporation) exceeds 50 percent of the value of the foreign company's total assets)
- after the acquisition, the foreign person, alone or together with one or more associates, holds an interest of less than 10 percent in the Australian land corporation
- the foreign person is not in a position:
- to influence or participate in the central management and control of the Australian land corporation
- to influence, participate in or determine the policy of the Australian land corporation.
Effect of exemptions
Previously, there were limited exemptions on the acquisition of shares in an Australian land corporation. They mainly involved acquisitions of shares in Australian land corporations listed on the Australian Stock Exchange.
In particular, the new exemption for Australian land corporations listed or to be listed extends to listings beyond the Australian Stock Exchange. Therefore, Australian land corporations (which can include foreign companies) proposing to list in a foreign stock exchange may do so, as the acquisition of shares below 10 percent of the total issued shares in the corporation will no longer require prior FIRB approval. This will facilitate trading on the relevant stock exchange.
Acquisitions of 10 percent or more
The significant investors who wish to acquire 10 percent or more of the shares in an Australian land corporation listed on a stock exchange will still require prior FIRB approval.
Note the acquisition is by 'the foreign person, alone or together with one or more associates'. 'Associates' is broadly defined in the Act and includes relatives, persons with whom the person is acting in concert, persons with whom the person carries on a business in partnership, directors of the corporation, a person who holds a substantial interest (being at least 20 percent) in the corporation etc. Prior to any acquisition, care must be taken to consider the shareholding of associates.
Trustees must take great care when distributing death benefits: lessons from the Court of Appeal
Trustees of a SMSF failed to give real and genuine consideration when distributing the deceased’s death benefit.
Panic stations? Responding to investigative notices in the wake of Smethurst v Commissioner of Police
By Shaun Temby & Natalie Wendon
Practical tips on what your organisation should do if issued with a compulsory notice from a regulator
You can’t always get what you want: Liquidator’s request for an extension of time refused
By Sam Kingston & Mathew Gashi
Explains a Court’s judgment where a longer period to bring a voidable transaction claim was not granted.
Leasing during lockdown – land tax and payroll tax relief during COVID-19
By Ari Armstrong
The tax relief eligible to landlords and impacted businesses granted by Australian states and territories.