Is a site audit statement worth the 'paper' it is written on?
In many transactions, site audit statements have become de facto certificates that a condition precedent or condition subsequent in an agreement has been satisfied (or not).
Multiples parties often rely on a site audit statement, such as vendors, purchasers, financiers, directors and decision makers within a company. However, are these parties entitled to rely on them? What does a site audit statement that confirms the land is suitable for a particular use actually tell them?
Maddocks partner and leading environment and planning lawyer Patrick Ibbotson examines the issues that may arise in transactions that rely on site audits.
Key contacts
Keep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upRecent articles

Understanding Australian Contract Law Through Evans v Air Canada
This case illustrates how important it is for contracts to be drafted clearly and comprehensively.

Navigating Privacy Reforms: Challenges and opportunities for government in 2025
This article covers key considerations for government agencies to ensure they are adapting to the changes.

The High Court clarifies the approach to site value and improvements
The significance of this decision goes to the heart of how site value (formerly ‘unimproved land value’) is assessed.
Partner
Sydney