Notification of data breaches
Do data breach notification laws apply to councils?
You’ve no doubt heard about the new Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme, which commenced on 22 February 2018. But have you wondered – does it apply to Victorian Councils?
The NDB scheme is contained in Part IIIC of the Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988. This Act also contains the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs).
While the APPs do not apply to local councils (see s 6C), councils may be subject to the NDB scheme where they are tax file number (TFN) recipients (see s 26WB).
A TFN recipient is anyone who is (whether lawfully or unlawfully) in possession or control of a record that contains TFN information. Where that record is held in the course of a person’s employment, the recipient is taken to be the person’s employer.
Under the NDB scheme, entities are required to notify the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) and affected individuals of any eligible data breaches. An eligible data breach occurs when there is loss of, unauthorised access to, or unauthorised disclosure of, personal information, which is likely to result in serious harm, and remedial action has not been taken to prevent such risk of harm.
The OAIC has published a range of guidance on the NDB scheme.
Maddocks has also published a number of articles on the NDB scheme - for example, this recent blog post.
So, to the extent that your council is a TFN recipient, it will need to prepare for the NDB scheme, including reviewing its systems containing TFN and personal information (such as payroll systems) and its data breach response plans.
Need advice on data breach notification laws?
Contact the Cyber & Date Resilience team.
Recent articles

Navigating major state tax changes in Victoria – what property developers need to know
By Michael Taylor-Sands, Andrew Wright
We break down the the State Taxation Acts Amendment Bill 2023 for property developers.

‘Jack’ and ‘Mac’ recognisably different: McDonald’s loses trade mark beef with Hungry Jack’s
By Georgia Hunt, Robert Gregory
McDonald’s has failed in its trade mark claim against Hungry Jack’s for the sale of its ‘Big Jack’ burger.

Inquiry into the drivers of philanthropic giving in Australia
In May 2023 we noted the Productivity Commission had commenced an inquiry into the Drivers of philanthropic giving.

New point of law: What can be considered as a protected document?
By Patrick Ibbotson, Susanne Rakoczy
A look at Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation [2023] NSWLEC 119.
Partner
Melbourne