Technology in contracting
Councils often ask us – how can we use technology to simplify contracting?
Councils often ask us – how can we use technology to simplify contracting? Using electronic signatures is one way of streamlining operations.
But are they binding like an ordinary signature?
In short, they are. Electronic signatures have the same legal effect under law in Australia if certain conditions are met. The Electronic Transactions (Victoria) Act 2000 (Act) provides guidelines for the acceptance of a signature of a person via electronic communication.
But there are risks. Electronic signatures may not be witnessed like a traditional signature, meaning there is greater possibility of misappropriation of the electronic signature or changes to a document after application of the electronic signature.
To combat these risks, digital signatures have been developed, which are a form of electronic signature with added benefits. The main difference is that a digital signature is linked to information or data that can be verified by using a digital signature platform.
Has your council considered using a digital signature platform? How will your council handle queries about the validity of electronic signatures if they are implemented?
Third-party payments and unfair preference claims- effective shield or not?
By Sam Kingston & Isabella Pierri
Unsecured creditors receiving payments in the current COVID-19 induced economic climate clearly do so at a heightened...
Ask and you may receive - creditors’ rights to information and call meetings
By Sam Kingston & Mathew Gashi
When is an external administrator obliged to respond to requests from creditors to access information and call meetings?...
Year-end earnings surprises and continuous disclosure: COVID-19 impact
With the financial year end (or half year) looming for many companies and the impact of COVID-19 over the last few...
Government decision makers should think twice before jumping on the ban-wagon: lessons from the Brett Cattle class action
Judgement potentially lowers bar for those impacted by government decisions to claim an unlawful exercise of power