About Us

We work collaboratively with our clients to build strong, sustainable relationships. Our team is committed to delivering consistent high standards of service, and we understand the importance of accessibility. Working with us, you'll enjoy open communication, meaning well scoped, properly resourced and effectively managed matters.

Learn More

Latest Case

Assisting on whole of government technology agreements November 2, 2017

Maddocks advised the Commonwealth Government’s Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) on its whole of government purchasing agreement with SAP. The DTA was set up in 2015 to assist government departments and agencies with digital transformation and … Continued

Latest News

Maddocks receives Employer of Choice for Equal Opportunity citation for 14th consecutive year February 21, 2018

Wednesday 21 February 2018 Maddocks has once again been recognised by the Workplace Gender Equality Agency for its initiatives in achieving gender equality. Maddocks received an Employer of Choice for Equal Opportunity citation today from … Continued

Latest Article

ACCC’s 2018 enforcement priorities – what you need to know February 20, 2018

Background If 2017 was the year that the ACCC emphasised consumer and small business protection (including an effective focus on achieving higher penalties), 2018 is set to be the year of cartels and the continued … Continued

Is it time to review your Protected Disclosure Procedures?

Councils have now had their Protected Disclosure Procedures (Procedures) in place for 18 months, as required by the Protected Disclosure Act 2012 (Act).

Consistent with recent comments made by the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC), it may now be time for councils to review their Procedures to ensure compliance with the Act, as well as their general effectiveness.

Findings of the IBAC Review

IBAC recently conducted a review into public sector bodies’ (including councils’) compliance with the requirements of the Act as they relate to the adoption and availability of Procedures. Upon completion of the review, IBAC found that:

  • while most public sector bodies surveyed had Procedures in place, some did not. Of those bodies who did not, this included four local councils who will be required to establish procedures by 31 March 2015
  • of the 114 public sector bodies that took part in the review, 88 met the requirements of s 60 of the Act, however, 26 did not
  • 34% of public sector bodies that took part in the review advised that they provided informal on-the-job training about protected disclosures for managers and supervisors, 30% advised that they provided formal training in-house training and 25% advised that no training had been conducted
  • the majority of public sector bodies that took part in the review (80 in total) advised that they had not yet measured the effectiveness of their communication methods
  • there were difficulties in explaining the complex requirements of the Act for making and assessing a protected disclosure in plain terms
  • there was considerable confusion as to whom the Procedures were directed – potential disclosers or protected disclosure coordinators and welfare officers.

Room for Improvement

The IBAC review noted that there were common errors and omissions throughout public sector bodies with respect to their compliance with the Act, including that:

  • procedures often failed to provide critical information about the confidentiality obligations under the Act – IBAC has suggested that public sector bodies may wish to supply further material to complement their Procedures
  • incorrect information was often provided relating to confidentiality, detrimental action and disclosure of confidential information
  • all public sector bodies would benefit from reviewing their Procedures in light of the issues identified by the IBAC review, particularly by considering:
    • whether their Procedures can be simplified and made more ‘user-friendly’
    • how their Procedures are made readily available, particularly to members of the public.

We agree that it is now timely for councils to review their Procedures to ensure not only compliance with the Act but also continuing workability in the context of public disclosures. In particular, councils should consider whether their Procedures are easily understood, and accessible to their staff and members of the public.

If you have concerns regarding your Protected Disclosure Procedures, or would like assistance with undertaking a review, please contact Kate Oliver, Senior Associate, on 61 3 9258 3333.

Councils have now had their Protected Disclosure Procedures (Procedures) in place for 18 months, as required by the Protected Disclosure Act 2012 (Act).

Consistent with recent comments made by the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC), it may now be time for councils to review their Procedures to ensure compliance with the Act, as well as their general effectiveness.

Findings of the IBAC Review

IBAC recently conducted a review into public sector bodies’ (including councils’) compliance with the requirements of the Act as they relate to the adoption and availability of Procedures. Upon completion of the review, IBAC found that:

  • while most public sector bodies surveyed had Procedures in place, some did not. Of those bodies who did not, this included four local councils who will be required to establish procedures by 31 March 2015
  • of the 114 public sector bodies that took part in the review, 88 met the requirements of s 60 of the Act, however, 26 did not
  • 34% of public sector bodies that took part in the review advised that they provided informal on-the-job training about protected disclosures for managers and supervisors, 30% advised that they provided formal training in-house training and 25% advised that no training had been conducted
  • the majority of public sector bodies that took part in the review (80 in total) advised that they had not yet measured the effectiveness of their communication methods
  • there were difficulties in explaining the complex requirements of the Act for making and assessing a protected disclosure in plain terms
  • there was considerable confusion as to whom the Procedures were directed – potential disclosers or protected disclosure coordinators and welfare officers.

Room for Improvement

The IBAC review noted that there were common errors and omissions throughout public sector bodies with respect to their compliance with the Act, including that:

  • procedures often failed to provide critical information about the confidentiality obligations under the Act – IBAC has suggested that public sector bodies may wish to supply further material to complement their Procedures
  • incorrect information was often provided relating to confidentiality, detrimental action and disclosure of confidential information
  • all public sector bodies would benefit from reviewing their Procedures in light of the issues identified by the IBAC review, particularly by considering:
    • whether their Procedures can be simplified and made more ‘user-friendly’
    • how their Procedures are made readily available, particularly to members of the public.

We agree that it is now timely for councils to review their Procedures to ensure not only compliance with the Act but also continuing workability in the context of public disclosures. In particular, councils should consider whether their Procedures are easily understood, and accessible to their staff and members of the public.

If you have concerns regarding your Protected Disclosure Procedures, or would like assistance with undertaking a review, please contact Kate Oliver, Senior Associate, on 61 3 9258 3333.