About Us

We work collaboratively with our clients to build strong, sustainable relationships. Our team is committed to delivering consistent high standards of service, and we understand the importance of accessibility. Working with us, you'll enjoy open communication, meaning well scoped, properly resourced and effectively managed matters.

Learn More

Latest Case

Providing strategic advice on expansion structures November 16, 2018

Founded in Bondi Beach in 2012, Bailey Nelson has rapidly grown into a global eyewear retailer and service provider with boutiques in Australia, London, Canada and New Zealand. The strong demand for their products and … Continued

Latest News

Maddocks appoints restructuring and insolvency partner in Sydney January 14, 2019

Monday 14 January  Maddocks has appointed its second new partner in a month with the appointment of Danielle Funston. Danielle is a restructuring and insolvency lawyer who advises clients on recoveries, liquidations, corporate restructuring and … Continued

Latest Article

Made in Australia: Tightened restrictions on the use of country of origin labels January 14, 2019

The recent decision of Nature’s Care Manufacture Pty Ltd v Australian Made Campaign Limited by the Federal Court of Australia has provided much needed guidance on the requirements for ‘Made in Australia’ and other country … Continued

Is it time to review your Protected Disclosure Procedures?

Councils have now had their Protected Disclosure Procedures (Procedures) in place for 18 months, as required by the Protected Disclosure Act 2012 (Act).

Consistent with recent comments made by the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC), it may now be time for councils to review their Procedures to ensure compliance with the Act, as well as their general effectiveness.

Findings of the IBAC Review

IBAC recently conducted a review into public sector bodies’ (including councils’) compliance with the requirements of the Act as they relate to the adoption and availability of Procedures. Upon completion of the review, IBAC found that:

  • while most public sector bodies surveyed had Procedures in place, some did not. Of those bodies who did not, this included four local councils who will be required to establish procedures by 31 March 2015
  • of the 114 public sector bodies that took part in the review, 88 met the requirements of s 60 of the Act, however, 26 did not
  • 34% of public sector bodies that took part in the review advised that they provided informal on-the-job training about protected disclosures for managers and supervisors, 30% advised that they provided formal training in-house training and 25% advised that no training had been conducted
  • the majority of public sector bodies that took part in the review (80 in total) advised that they had not yet measured the effectiveness of their communication methods
  • there were difficulties in explaining the complex requirements of the Act for making and assessing a protected disclosure in plain terms
  • there was considerable confusion as to whom the Procedures were directed – potential disclosers or protected disclosure coordinators and welfare officers.

Room for Improvement

The IBAC review noted that there were common errors and omissions throughout public sector bodies with respect to their compliance with the Act, including that:

  • procedures often failed to provide critical information about the confidentiality obligations under the Act – IBAC has suggested that public sector bodies may wish to supply further material to complement their Procedures
  • incorrect information was often provided relating to confidentiality, detrimental action and disclosure of confidential information
  • all public sector bodies would benefit from reviewing their Procedures in light of the issues identified by the IBAC review, particularly by considering:
    • whether their Procedures can be simplified and made more ‘user-friendly’
    • how their Procedures are made readily available, particularly to members of the public.

We agree that it is now timely for councils to review their Procedures to ensure not only compliance with the Act but also continuing workability in the context of public disclosures. In particular, councils should consider whether their Procedures are easily understood, and accessible to their staff and members of the public.

If you have concerns regarding your Protected Disclosure Procedures, or would like assistance with undertaking a review, please contact Kate Oliver, Senior Associate, on 61 3 9258 3333.

Councils have now had their Protected Disclosure Procedures (Procedures) in place for 18 months, as required by the Protected Disclosure Act 2012 (Act).

Consistent with recent comments made by the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC), it may now be time for councils to review their Procedures to ensure compliance with the Act, as well as their general effectiveness.

Findings of the IBAC Review

IBAC recently conducted a review into public sector bodies’ (including councils’) compliance with the requirements of the Act as they relate to the adoption and availability of Procedures. Upon completion of the review, IBAC found that:

  • while most public sector bodies surveyed had Procedures in place, some did not. Of those bodies who did not, this included four local councils who will be required to establish procedures by 31 March 2015
  • of the 114 public sector bodies that took part in the review, 88 met the requirements of s 60 of the Act, however, 26 did not
  • 34% of public sector bodies that took part in the review advised that they provided informal on-the-job training about protected disclosures for managers and supervisors, 30% advised that they provided formal training in-house training and 25% advised that no training had been conducted
  • the majority of public sector bodies that took part in the review (80 in total) advised that they had not yet measured the effectiveness of their communication methods
  • there were difficulties in explaining the complex requirements of the Act for making and assessing a protected disclosure in plain terms
  • there was considerable confusion as to whom the Procedures were directed – potential disclosers or protected disclosure coordinators and welfare officers.

Room for Improvement

The IBAC review noted that there were common errors and omissions throughout public sector bodies with respect to their compliance with the Act, including that:

  • procedures often failed to provide critical information about the confidentiality obligations under the Act – IBAC has suggested that public sector bodies may wish to supply further material to complement their Procedures
  • incorrect information was often provided relating to confidentiality, detrimental action and disclosure of confidential information
  • all public sector bodies would benefit from reviewing their Procedures in light of the issues identified by the IBAC review, particularly by considering:
    • whether their Procedures can be simplified and made more ‘user-friendly’
    • how their Procedures are made readily available, particularly to members of the public.

We agree that it is now timely for councils to review their Procedures to ensure not only compliance with the Act but also continuing workability in the context of public disclosures. In particular, councils should consider whether their Procedures are easily understood, and accessible to their staff and members of the public.

If you have concerns regarding your Protected Disclosure Procedures, or would like assistance with undertaking a review, please contact Kate Oliver, Senior Associate, on 61 3 9258 3333.