Wolfgang Hellmann
Wolfgang is a competition law expert in the Maddocks Corporate & Commercial team, with extensive expertise in all aspects of competition law.
View profile
With the new merger notification regime about to go live on 1 January 2026, the Treasurer made important amendments to its Notification of Acquisitions Determination (Determination) on 18 December 2025.
In this update, we summarise the key changes which will have a significant impact on the notification requirements for certain types of acquisitions.
The notification thresholds which will apply to asset acquisitions depend on whether or not the asset acquisition is “of all or substantially all of the assets of a business”:
If the asset acquisition involves all or substantially all of the assets of a business, the same Australian turnover thresholds as for share acquisitions apply (see table below), and the target’s Australian turnover attributable to that business is relevant when determining whether any of the Australian turnover thresholds is met.
| Turnover Thresholds for Share Acquisitions | |
| 1 | Combined Australian turnover of acquirer group and target group ≥ $200M and Australian turnover of the target group ≥ $50M |
| 2 | Australian turnover of the acquirer group ≥ $500M and Australian turnover of the target group ≥ $10M |
| 3 | Serial acquisitions Thresholds 1 and 2 apply, but add Australian turnover of all targets with similar business (i.e. that predominantly operate in the same “market”, ignoring geographic factors) acquired by the acquirer group in the previous 3 years, but excluding acquisitions of:
|
Where the acquisition involves a ‘discrete’ asset (which does not represent all or substantially all of the assets of a business), the following transaction value thresholds apply:
When determining the Australian ‘group’ turnover of the acquirer and the target, the Australian turnover of all entities that are ‘connected’ with the acquirer and the target needs to be aggregated.
The definition of “connected entities” is very wide and includes:
“Control” is defined (widely) as the capacity to determine the outcome of decisions about an entity’s financial and operating policies, and in determining whether such a capacity exists, the practical influence an entity can exert over another entity is determinative (i.e. not only control based on legal rights such as veto rights, but also ‘de facto’ control).
The term “associate” is also defined broadly to include (i) controlled entities and entities under common control; (ii) persons with whom the primary person has, or proposes to enter into, a relevant agreement for the purpose of controlling or influencing the composition of the designated body’s board or the conduct of the designated body’s affairs; and (iii) a person with whom the primary person is acting, or proposing to act, in concert in relation to the designated body’s affairs.
The Determination now prescribes that an entity cannot be considered to be an ‘associate’ of another entity for the sole reason that it has been provided with ‘minority shareholder protection’ rights, which are defined to include rights that are consistent with the rights normally accorded to minority shareholders to protect their financial interests as investors and which are reasonably appropriate and adapted to achieving this purpose.
Under Division 1 of Part IVA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Act), acquisitions of a non-controlling minority shareholding are not notifiable. However, the Treasurer has the power to determine that certain classes of acquisitions are required to be notified even where there is no notification requirement under the Act, and the Treasurer has done so in relation to the following classes of acquisitions:
There is an exemption from the notification requirement for acquisitions of a legal or equitable interest in land if the acquisition is undertaken “in the ordinary course of business”.
The Treasurer’s Explanatory Statement explains that this exemption is intended to apply to ‘routine’ land acquisitions and provides the following examples:
The new merger regime contains a quite complex suite of notification requirements which will lead to many more acquisitions being notifiable in Australia. The complexity of the regime means that dealmakers need to be extra careful not to inadvertently fail to notify their transaction to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
If your organisation is currently considering an acquisition or has any medium to long term acquisition strategies, we encourage you to speak with us to ensure that any necessary merger filing processes are managed in an optimal way.
Wolfgang is a competition law expert in the Maddocks Corporate & Commercial team, with extensive expertise in all aspects of competition law.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upThis case will have real consequences for how companies communicate product and pricing changes to Australian consumers.
Federal Court proceedings against Amazon over alleged unfair contract terms in Amazon Prime subscription contracts.
The ACCC responds to the growing use and safety issues arising from the use of these products.
OAIC determinations clarify privacy obligations for organisations using tracking pixels.
Partner
Melbourne