Shaun Temby
Shaun has over two decades of expertise in commercial disputes, competition, and consumer law and provides strategic legal solutions to franchising and consumer markets clients.
View profile
The ACCC’s work in consumer markets and the retail sector during 2025 was marked by a renewed focus on pricing transparency, unfair ‘no-refund’ policies, and unfair contract terms more broadly in areas such as gym membership, food delivery, and streaming services. Enforcement activity targeted misleading promotional conduct by major retailers, while administrative action and public warnings were used to address systemic issues in online sales and subscription models.
The ACCC also contributed to broader policy reform, including the Grocery Sector Inquiry, digital platform regulation and the ‘Right to Repair’ agenda. While the ACCC made visible progress in several areas, we haven’t yet seen test cases in the area of unfair contract terms, much progress in the ongoing litigation against the major supermarkets or the detail of proposed prohibitions on unfair trading practices.

Misleading pricing proceedings – sizeable penalties
In November 2025, the Federal Court ordered The Good Guys to pay $13.5 million for failing to disclose key conditions in its “bonus gift card” offers. Similarly, Webjet, a popular online travel site, was fined $9 million for advertising airfares in a misleading way by displaying false “discount” claims and omitting mandatory fees in emails, on its website and on social media. These outcomes underscore the ACCC’s focus on misleading discount and surcharge practices in the retail sector and are also relevant to its broader “cost of living” focus.

Refund policies and “was/now” pricing
Last year, the ACCC conducted several proactive compliance sweeps in the retail sector, building on early success with this approach for greenwashing claims.
Consistent with the results of other similar sweeps, they did not lead to new court cases, but multiple businesses voluntarily corrected their practices and provided the ACCC with intelligence for future enforcement and a small number of infringement notices were also issued.
The long-running Grocery Sector Study remains at the forefront of ACCC market inquiries, with its final report informing the implementation of reforms in 2025 and the design of a second tranche of reforms addressing pricing transparency and regional supply.
The ACCC's Small Business Survey was updated in late 2024 and continued to inform Government policy settings last year. We expect the 2025 survey update to reveal shifting sentiment among participants.
The ACCC has contributed to broader consumer law reform processes, including the Productivity Commission’s Right to Repair inquiry, where it supported reforms to address legal and practical barriers to repair and highlighted the impacts on consumers and small businesses.
While digital platforms are addressed in a separate chapter, last year, the ACCC continued its Digital Platform Services Inquiry, which is likely to have some implications for the retail sector. For example, the Commission explored the competitive impact of loyalty schemes (such as ‘flybuys’ and ‘Everyday Rewards’), digital wallets, and various “buy now, pay later” services. The ACCC Chair, Ms Gina Cass-Gottlieb, also flagged potential future scrutiny of the gig economy’s intersection with retail, particularly in food delivery and fast fashion.
Throughout 2025, the ACCC engaged in policy discussions on extending the Consumer Data Right (CDR) to the retail sector. While no retail-specific CDR scheme was launched, the Commission expressed support for enabling consumers to share loyalty or purchase data to access better deals.
The ACCC also continues its broader campaigns across consumer retail to tackle unfair contract terms (UCT) and misleading subscription traps under the “new” unfair contract regime. The ACCC sent notifications to operators in sectors such as gym membership, food delivery, and streaming services in late 2025, with subsequent UCT proceedings mooted. We expect to see additional publicity on the results of these efforts later this year concerning the actions taken by the ACCC and the administrative resolutions reached with targeted businesses.
In parallel to its efforts to promote the UCT regime, the ACCC continued to advocate for a broader prohibition on “unfair trading practices” under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). This proposed reform would target manipulative conduct – sometimes referred to as ‘dark patterns’, that are currently claimed to fall outside of existing protections – though that is debatable. The proceedings against Microsoft and will shed light on the extent of current proceedings for this type of conduct and the need for further legislative reform.
In 2025, the ACCC made solid progress on its stated priorities for the consumer markets & retail sector, though some matters remain incomplete. It delivered meaningfully on supermarket sector competition and pricing transparency, completing the Grocery Inquiry and continued its proceedings against Australian supermarkets for misleading discount claims. The enforcement actions against The Good Guys and Webjet also demonstrated a clear focus on misleading pricing and surcharges. However, the absence of test cases under the new UCT regime marked a gap in enforcement, with the ACCC instead focusing on compliance engagement and preparatory work. Similarly, while the regulator advocated for a general prohibition on unfair trading practices, no legislative progress was made in 2025. Finally, small business survey results show that their grievances remain stubbornly unchanged, and other issues (such as the right to repair) are still not working as well as the ACCC might hope. In short, the ACCC still has a bit to do to deliver on this aspect of its overall responsibilities.
In 2026, we might see:
Our annual examination of enforcement and regulatory activity by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
Shaun has over two decades of expertise in commercial disputes, competition, and consumer law and provides strategic legal solutions to franchising and consumer markets clients.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upThe Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (Cth) is central to Australia’s critical infrastructure framework.
This case will have real consequences for how companies communicate product and pricing changes to Australian consumers.
Federal Court proceedings against Amazon over alleged unfair contract terms in Amazon Prime subscription contracts.
The ACCC responds to the growing use and safety issues arising from the use of these products.
Partner
Sydney