Anthony Willis
Anthony is recognised as one of Australia's leading government lawyers, with expertise in commercial, regulatory, governance, and technology matters.
View profile
When a Commonwealth agency engages a contractor to create deliverables, the agreement frequently provides that the Commonwealth will own the intellectual property (IP) rights in the resulting deliverables. This is logical and generally not contentious. The Commonwealth should have the right to use and benefit from material for which it pays.
However, in a complex and interconnected world, it is increasingly likely that contractors will use or incorporate material created by a third party into their deliverables. This can create serious problems for the Commonwealth, particularly if the contractor does not obtain the necessary rights to that material. If that happens, the Commonwealth may be forced to choose between:
Each of these options poses potential risk, and are likely to create uncertainty, delay and expense.
This article will explain the importance of obtaining third party licences, and how effective contract management can reduce associated risks.
Commonwealth contracts for the procurement of deliverables in which IP rights subsist frequently provide that:
Ideally, third parties whose material is incorporated into, or is otherwise necessary in order to make full use of, deliverables, will grant the Commonwealth a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, fully paid-up, unconditional, sublicensable licence to use their material to the extent necessary for the Commonwealth to obtain the full use and benefit of those deliverables.
If these provisions are properly implemented, the Commonwealth can use the deliverables without being concerned about infringing another party’s rights.
In some cases the agency will not own, but is granted unlimited rights to use, the IP in the deliverables. In those cases, exactly the same considerations apply.
Even if a contract contains the provisions outlined above, there is a risk that the contractor will not obtain sufficient rights or licences to allow the Commonwealth to use the material as required. This can occur if, for example:
A contractor is engaged by a Commonwealth agency to write a report which includes technical diagrams. The contractor subcontracts a third party to create the technical diagrams. The third party creates the diagrams, the contractor inserts them into the report, and the agency proceeds to publish and use the report.
The contract between the agency and the contractor required the contractor to obtain all necessary rights and licences needed to allow the agency to obtain the full use and benefit of the report. The agency trusted that the contractor had obtained these licences as required, and does not look into the matter further.
However, unbeknownst to the agency, the subcontract between the contractor and the third party only permitted the use of the diagrams during the term of the subcontract.
Six months after the expiry of the subcontract, the agency receives a letter of demand from the third party, alleging that the agency’s publication and use of the diagrams infringes its copyright, and demanding that the agency immediately:
Even if the agency is able to recover damages or rely on an indemnity from its contractor, the situation creates uncertainty, inconvenience, and potential embarrassment for the agency which money cannot necessarily remedy.
As an aside, the agency may be protected against copyright infringement by the Crown copyright provisions in s.183 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). However, it will still be required to pay a licence fee, and the administrative processes associated with use of those provisions can be considerable.
There are a number of simple, practical steps that agencies can take to reduce the risk that deliverables are not accompanied by a grant of the necessary third party rights, including:
Although it is not possible to completely eliminate the risk of inadvertently infringing third parties’ rights, these steps will help identify and mitigate potential problems before they arise.
Although Commonwealth contracts generally provide that:
there is a risk that the contractor will not obtain the necessary third party rights, meaning that the Commonwealth is left in an undesirable situation for which the recovery of money from the contractor is unlikely to be a complete remedy.
Commonwealth agencies can reduce the risk of this arising by taking practical contract management steps such as:
These steps may not completely eliminate the risk, but taking them is a simple and effective way of reducing it.
If you are not sure whether your agency’s contract contains appropriate provisions, or what steps you can take to ensure it has the required rights, Anthony Willis at Maddocks is able to help. He and his team have many years of experience in advising on and assisting with complex IP ownership and licensing arrangements in Commonwealth contracts, including providing practical advice to remedy undesirable ownership arrangements.
Anthony is recognised as one of Australia's leading government lawyers, with expertise in commercial, regulatory, governance, and technology matters.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upThe Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (Cth) is central to Australia’s critical infrastructure framework.
This case will have real consequences for how companies communicate product and pricing changes to Australian consumers.
The Commonwealth Government will establish a set of Australian Standards for AI.
The ACCC responds to the growing use and safety issues arising from the use of these products.
Partner
Canberra