Shaun Temby
Shaun has over two decades of expertise in commercial disputes, competition, and consumer law and provides strategic legal solutions to franchising and consumer markets clients.
View profile
The ACCC has launched proceedings against two major vehicle distributors — Ateco and Jayco —alleging misleading advertising about vehicle durability and off-road capabilities. These cases are a timely reminder for all businesses, especially those in the automotive and consumer goods sectors, to ensure marketing claims are accurate, substantiated, and aligned with product performance.
The ACCC allege that despite being branded as “durable and tough”, suitable to be used on or near various terrains and off-road environments and without material risk of developing rust or corrosion within 10 years of manufacture, some LDV-branded vehicles have a propensity to develop rust and corrosion earlier than expected.
The ACCC’s case against Ateco focuses on several promotional claims, including:
Whilst making the above representations to customers, the ACCC allege that, from around 2018, Ateco was aware rust and/or corrosion was appearing in the T60 and G10 vehicles within the first five years after manufacture. Further, between January 2018 and April 2019, Ateco received 110 notifications that these vehicles had rusted or corroded. Between 2018 and November 2024, there were at least 5,684 occasions where consumers complained about rust and/or corrosion. According to the ACCC, Ateco continued to advertise the relevant model vehicles as durable and suitable for diverse terrains (despite the above knowledge).
In separate proceedings, the ACCC alleges that from around January 2020, Jayco advertised several caravan models on Instagram, Facebook and YouTube, as well as releasing print and digital promotional material representing the relevant model caravans had been designed specifically for use off-road and/or on four-wheel drive (4WD) tracks. Jayco’s advertising included the following kinds of statements or images:
Despite these claims, Jayco’s warranty terms and conditions for the relevant models indicate the caravans are designed to be towed behind 4WD passenger vehicles, but are not actually designed for use or towing off-road and on terrain with hard impacts and heavy landings. In promoting the caravans in this way, knowing that the caravans are not suitable for off-road driving, the ACCC alleges that Jayco has engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and made false or misleading representations liable to mislead the public.
While Ateco has acknowledged the legal proceedings initiated by the ACCC and filed their concise statement in reply, neither Ateco nor Jayco have released public statements addressing the matters, or announced their intention to halt advertising and/or distribution of relevant model vehicles. Despite this, we assume that they will initially vigorously defend the claims.
These two recent proceedings demonstrate the ACCC’s ongoing interest in misleading advertising in the automotive industry, but there are broader lessons available. Businesses should consider the following:
Keep up to date with our legal insights and events
Shaun has over two decades of expertise in commercial disputes, competition, and consumer law and provides strategic legal solutions to franchising and consumer markets clients.
View profileRebecca is a Senior Associate in our Dispute Resolution & Litigation practice. She has significant advocacy experience, including recent involvement in major litigation.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upThis case will have real consequences for how companies communicate product and pricing changes to Australian consumers.
The ACCC responds to the growing use and safety issues arising from the use of these products.
OAIC determinations clarify privacy obligations for organisations using tracking pixels.
Participation requires much more than a legal response.
Partner
Sydney