Legal Insights

Model Work Health and Safety Laws Under Review: Final report arrives with 21 recommendations

By
• 28 October 2026 • 7 min read

Key takeaways

  • Safe Work Australia’s final report proposes greater national consistency in WHS laws and enforcement, alongside changes to address psychosocial hazards and emerging risks associated with harmful workplace behaviours, AI and climate change.
     
  • The recommendations are not yet law. However, if adopted, the proposed reforms could have significant implications for employers in model law jurisdictions. Employers should monitor developments and consider whether their WHS systems, policies and procedures are well placed to respond to potential changes.

The model work health and safety (WHS) laws have undergone their second national review by Safe Work Australia since their introduction in 2011, following their first comprehensive review in 2018. Safe Work Australia’s latest assessment culminates in 21 recommendations aimed at strengthening harmonisation and ensuring the model WHS framework responds to emerging risks.

On 19 October 2026, Safe Work Australia published its final report of its Best Practice Review of the model WHS laws.

Key recommendations include:

  • developing a new National Compliance and Enforcement Policy (NCEP);
  • amending the statutory duty of care so that it expressly includes an obligation to manage risks arising from harmful workplace behaviours;
  • ensuring that hierarchy of control measures are applied to the management of psychosocial risks; 
  • enabling any person or organisation to prosecute WHS offences; and
  • allowing courts to return alternative verdicts for industrial manslaughter and Category 1 and 2 offences.

Although the recommendations are not yet law, the report offers insight into how WHS laws in Australia may evolve. Below we outline the proposed changes and what they could mean for employers.

What are the model WHS laws?

The model WHS laws refer to the following instruments:

  • model Work Health and Safety Act; 
  • model Work Health and Safety Regulations; and
  • model Codes of Practice.

The model WHS laws are not in force by themselves but operate as templates that state and territory jurisdictions can adopt. All Australian states and territories except Victoria have adopted the model WHS laws. 

The laws were intended to create harmony across jurisdictions. However, states and territories have made several changes in excess of the need to accommodate core jurisdictional differences. 

What was the scope of the review?

In September 2024, WHS ministers asked Safe Work Australia to undertake the review of the model WHS laws. Key areas within the scope of the review included:

  • assessing whether the model WHS Act and Regulations reflect best practice and are operating as intended, particularly in view of emerging risks in contemporary workplaces;
  • examining state and territory provisions that “significantly depart” from the model WHS laws and recommending whether any of those variations should be adopted nationally; and
  • providing recommendations on strengthening harmonisation against a background of growing divergence between jurisdictions.

Who did Safe Work Australia consult?

Safe Work Australia spoke with a broad range of stakeholders, including workers, families affected by workplace fatalities, businesses, unions, peak bodies, community groups, inspectors, experts, prosecutors and judges. 

In March 2026, Safe Work Australia published a report summarising the consultation process and the key themes that emerged. For further detail on Safe Work Australia’s consultation and its findings, see our earlier article: Model Work Health and Safety Laws Under Review: Insights from stakeholder consultation.

What issues did Safe Work Australia identify?

Safe Work Australia identified the following key issues:

  • Despite support for harmonisation of the model WHS laws, jurisdictional variations continue to be enacted.
  • There is a need for further guidance on the application of the ‘reasonably practicable’ standard with respect to specific industries. 
  • The current volunteer officer exemption lacks clarity.
  • There is inconsistency and a lack of transparency in compliance and enforcement across Australian states and territories. 
  • Consultation can become a ‘tick-a-box’ exercise as opposed to genuine engagement. 
  • The model WHS Regulations focus on specific physical hazards and male-dominated industries.
  • Work-related fatalities have fallen by 24% since 2014, but that progress has stalled.
  • The incidence of serious workers’ compensation claims rose 13.6% between 2018–19 and 2023–24, driven by psychological injury claims in some jurisdictions.
  • Artificial intelligence, climate change and harmful workplace behaviours are major trends reshaping workplace risk.

Recommendations 

The Report made 21 recommendations across 7 categories. 

The proposals for reform are set out below: 

  • Harmonisation

    1. WHS ministers recommit to harmonisation of laws, so workers receive consistent protections and businesses have consistent obligations.

    2. Harmonisation be maintained and strengthened through considering potential state or territory amendments at the national level and prioritising the passage of nationally agreed amendments across all jurisdictions.

    3. A new NCEP be developed that provides more detail about how decisions will be made and how key aspects of the model WHS laws will be enforced.

  • Duties

    4. The statutory duty of care include management of risks arising from harmful workplace behaviours. 

    5. Volunteer officers of strata/community title corporations not be liable for breaches of officer duties. 

    6. The hierarchy of control be applied to all types of work and risks. 

    7. A WHS Information Statement be provided to workers. 

  • Consultation

    8. A suite of ‘best practice’ provisions be incorporated into the model WHS laws, including a right to cease unsafe work, a union right of entry, and changes to health and safety representative (HSR) entitlements and powers such as expanded information-gathering powers.

  • Compliance and enforcement

    9. The timeframe for internal review of WHS decisions be increased from 14 to 21 days. Workers, HSRs and unions be given standing in an external review where they have raised or been involved in a matter. Furthermore, non-payment of WHS infringement notices be made an offence.

    10. General standing be granted for persons or organisations to prosecute WHS offences.

    11. A contract of insurance or grant of indemnity cannot be used to cover the legal fees of a person subject to a WHS prosecution.

    12. The use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) be restricted where they could compromise WHS rights or obligations.

    13. A nationally consistent approach to infringement notice schemes be developed and consideration be given to which provisions of the model WHS laws should attract infringement penalties and which should attract civil penalties.

    14. A suite of ‘best practice’ provisions be incorporated into the model WHS laws, including measures such as enhanced regulator investigation powers, expanded information sharing and the introduction of alternative verdicts for industrial manslaughter and Category 1 and Category 2 offences.

  • Codes of Practice

    15. Persons who comply with a Code be taken to have complied with the relevant WHS duty in relation to matters addressed by that Code.

    16. Industry-based Codes of Practice be developed with accompanying small business implementation toolkits.

    17. Consideration be given to the introduction of National Codes of Practice. 

  • Modernisation project

    18. A model WHS Regulations modernisation project be undertaken to improve consistency and appropriately regulate modern work, workplaces and emerging hazards.

  • Emerging risks

    19. A strategy on AI and other emerging digital technologies be developed which monitors how WHS laws are applied to these technologies to ensure the laws and regulations remain fit for purpose.

    20. A strategy on climate change be developed to monitor the application of laws regarding extreme weather and to identify and address gaps, and model regulations addressing extreme heat, air quality and vector-borne diseases be created.

    21. A strategy on harmful behaviours be developedto strengthen understanding of how the laws apply to harmful workplace behaviours and regulations be created to regulate access to facilities and address workplace violence and harassment. 

What could this mean for employers?

While these recommendations are not yet law, the report signals the direction of future model WHS laws. Employers should consider and prepare for the following potential impacts:

  • standing for workers and unions in external reviews;
  • any person or organisation being able to prosecute employers for alleged breaches; 
  • limits on NDAs that interfere with WHS rights;
  • restrictions on insurance for prosecution legal costs; a requirement to provide workers with basic WHS information;
  • strengthened HSR arrangements, consultation mechanisms, rights to cease unsafe work and union right of entry;
  • clearer obligations to address psychosocial hazards and harmful workplace behaviour through WHS risk-management processes;
  • compliance with Codes of Practice to be taken to mean adherence to the relevant WHS duty; and
  • increased regulatory attention regarding AI, climate-related hazards and harmful behaviours.

What's next? 

Following the release of the final report, the focus will now turn to whether, and to what extent, the recommendations will be implemented. Any agreed amendments to the model WHS laws will need to be enacted by participating jurisdictions before taking effect. 

We’re here to help.

Please get in touch if you would like guidance on how the recommendations may affect your organisation or assistance with reviewing your WHS practices, policies and procedures.

Catherine Dunlop

Catherine is one of Australia's leading lawyers working with clients on work health and safety (WHS), behavioural investigations and inquests, inquiries and Royal Commissions.

View profile

Dale McQualter

Dale advises and acts for both private and public sector employers in the areas of workplace health and safety, employment, coronial inquests, and workplace investigations.

View profile

Amber Davis

Amber advises and acts for both private and public sector employers in the areas of workplace health and safety (WHS) and employment law.

View profile
By

Recent articles

Online Access