Bruce Heddle
One of Australia's leading employment and industrial relations litigators, Bruce has extensive experience advising clients in multiple industries.
View profileThis article reminds employers of the key PCBU duties concerning the management of risks to the safety of workers caused by heat, with reference to a number of recent prosecutions across Australian jurisdictions.

Australians have been experiencing another long, hot summer and extreme temperatures (which have been exacerbated due to high humidity) are continuing across the country.
It was only a month ago, on 11 January 2024, that Sydney recorded its highest ever level of humidity. In parts of Victoria, residents have been dealing with extremely hot, dry, and windy conditions, similar to what was seen during the Black Summer Bushfires in 2019/20.
Extreme temperatures, in turn, create extreme, and potentially hazardous, work conditions for some workers. Related safety risks can include exposure to high UV radiation and humidity, hydration issues and poor airflow/ventilation.
At the end of last year, safety regulators urged employers to have a plan to ensure that workers can work safely through the heat of summer. So the question arises – is your workplace prepared to manage extreme temperatures? Whether outdoors, or indoors, excessive heat at work is a risk to the health and safety of your most important asset – your workers.
Excessive heat impacts the capability, productivity and capacity of workers, and may lead to injury or even fatalities if appropriate systems and controls are not in place.
PCBUs have a primary duty under work health and safety legislation to ensure the health and safety of workers. This requires PCBU’s to eliminate risks to health and safety to the extent reasonably practicable (or minimise risks if elimination is not reasonably practicable). Employers can do this by ensuring, so far as is reasonably practicable, the:
There are also a number of other PCBU duties which are important to remember – including a duty to consult with other PCBUs where multiple PCBUs have duties in respect of the same workplace. As we will see in one case below, multiple PCBUs can be prosecuted for failures in relation to the same risks.
In some jurisdictions, PCBUs also have an express duty under work health and safety regulations to ensure ventilation for workers who carry out work in extreme heat.[1]
A 27-year-old international backpacker, Olivier Caramin died in 2017 in a Townsville hospital the day after he collapsed while working at a watermelon farm. Oliver Caramin was working outdoors on a day when the temperature topped 40 degrees. Bradford Clark Rosten, a sole trader and operator of a labour hire contract business which organised harvests for clients, had employed Oliver Caramin to work on the farm. The farm was leased by Zalaba Investments Pty Ltd.
$65,000 fine imposed on Bradford Clark Rosten
$100,000 fine imposed on M & L Zabala Investments Pty Ltd (in subsequent and separate proceedings)
The prosecution followed the death of a worker in an underground mine in regional New South Wales in April 2017, caused by heat-related stress and the underground working conditions in the mine on the day.
$480,000 fine imposed on Peak Gold Mines
A number of unsafe working practices can be easily identified from recent prosecutions and incidents – whether it be inadequate induction, training, or systems, a failure to monitor or adapt to changing conditions, or even to identify and respond to symptoms of heat stroke.
They serve as an important reminder for PCBUs that often simple steps can significantly reduce heat-related health and safety risks.
SafeWork NSW and WorkSafe Victoria each provide helpful guidance for PCBUs on this issue: see NSW here and Victoria here.
Some of the questions you should be asking when preparing for hot conditions and managing heat risks in the workplace are:
If you have any questions about implementing appropriate heat-related safety provisions in your organisation, please contact our work health and safety team.
[1] Regulations 40(e) and (f), Model WHS Regulations.
One of Australia's leading employment and industrial relations litigators, Bruce has extensive experience advising clients in multiple industries.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upThe potential liability arising from directors’ use of AI remains undeveloped and evolving.
The Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (Cth) is central to Australia’s critical infrastructure framework.
This case will have real consequences for how companies communicate product and pricing changes to Australian consumers.
Partner
Sydney