Pria O'Sullivan
Pria advises government and private clients on a wide range of property, construction and planning law matters.
View profileAs the Canberra landscape changes, property owners and developers are increasingly looking to undertake infill projects or regenerate existing properties.
These projects usually cannot proceed without a variation to the Crown lease, either to add in new uses or to expand the permissible gross floor area limits. The lease variation charge (LVC) is assessed and becomes payable when a property owner obtains development approval to vary the Crown lease.
The property industry has been lobbying the Territory Government since 2011 to amend the existing LVC process, and LVC continues to be cited as an impediment to undertaking both commercial and residential developments in the Australian Capital Territory.
Changes LVC process came into force in May this year via the passing of the Planning and Development (Lease Variation Charge Deferred Payment Scheme) Amendment Act 2018 (Amending Act). They are the latest changes seeking to stimulate development, since the economic stimulus remission on the LVC was introduced in 2014.
Questions remain as to whether these changes will encourage further investment in Canberra or provide the conditions needed to kick start developments that have not progressed to date as a result of the assessed LVC amounts.
The amendments to the Planning and Development Act 2007 (PDA) do not alter the calculation of LVC or provide any new remissions on the payment of LVC. Rather, the Amending Act implements a deferred payment scheme for eligible development approvals and extends the operation of existing LVC remissions. The Amending Act also makes minor modifications and improvements to the administration of the LVC regime.
When the Amending Act was introduced, Chief Minister Andrew Barr endorsed the proposed changes, stating that "The LVC is designed to make sure the community shares in the windfall gains developers make when government varies a lease to allow for new development”.[1] However, one of the continuing obstacles property owners and developers encounter is the assessment of LVC is not offset by the cost of associated works that developers are often required to fund as a condition of its development approval, or by the costs of demolition to redevelop sites.
Under the deferred payment scheme, Crown lessees that meet certain requirements will have the option to defer payment of the LVC until a later date in the development cycle so as to more closely align payment with the cash-flows received through a project. This means eligible Crown lessees are not required to pay the LVC before a Crown lease is varied, as was previously the case.
The scheme prescribes that the choice to defer payment of the LVC will only apply to projects with an assessed LVC of more than $100,000. For projects that meet this monetary threshold, Crown lessees will be able to enter into deferral arrangements with the Commissioner of Revenue until such time as a Certificate of Occupancy is issued, or for up to four years – whichever comes first. Interest will be paid on the amount of LVC deferred.
What property owners and developers need to be aware of:
Currently, property owners receive a 25 percent reduction on the LVC amount that would otherwise be payable on a non-codified Crown lease variation. The Amending Act has made changes to the remissions scheme so that the entitlement to specific remissions have been moved from within the PDA to become the subject of separate dis-allowable instruments. This means the Minister for Planning determines the circumstances which will attract an LVC remission and the Treasurer determines the amount of the remission without needing to vary the PDA.
The economic stimulus remission has been discontinued. Of the remissions that remain available, the remissions for environmental remediation of service stations and approval of environmentally sustainable buildings that meet particular energy efficiency requirements and a 25 percent remission on some codified LVC situations, are the most relevant to property developers. There is also a remission related to chargeable variations of Crown leases held by the housing commissioner.
The current intention by the Territory Government is that these remissions will operate until mid-2019 when the new remission regime is expected to be finalised.
Deferral is, therefore, meant to provide greater flexibility for developers to pay the LVC towards the end of the project, better matching the development cash-flows. However, as it has to be paid when a certificate of occupancy is issued, this will still require payment before sale proceeds are realised on any project involving a build to sell model. Developers who do not need external finance will likely benefit most from this arrangement.
For those developers who need to secure finance to proceed with a proposed development project, the deferral scheme could make the project less attractive. It is expected that the financiers will view deferred LVC payments as an additional liability, when determining whether to approve funding. Financiers will also need to be comfortable that their security will rank behind the Territory’s first ranking charge for securing repayment of the deferred LVC amount.
While the proposed changes are welcomed, we consider the debate surrounding the acceptability of the amount of LVC that is assessed will continue, and the property industry will closely monitor the take up of deferral options in order to gauge the success of the deferral measure.
Contact the Property & Development team.
Pria advises government and private clients on a wide range of property, construction and planning law matters.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upWe explore in detail the key issues that developers may face going down this route.
The Victorian Government released its response to an expert panel review aimed at reforming the Owners Corporations Act.
How to be ready to comply with additional compliance obligations under the Privacy Act as a result of these reforms.
We take a look at impacts on construction cost and programs in Australia
Partner
Canberra