Court finds directors breached their duties by relying on AI for legal strategy and advice
The Supreme Court of NSW provides an example of the risks of the use of AI by directors in their governance.

In our March 2023 edition of The Lot, we set out the Federal Government reform of the laws governing unfair contract terms (UCT). You can read our earlier article here.
The amendments to the laws governing UCT came into effect on 9 November 2023 and now apply to new contracts made at or after 9 November 2023, including any contracts which are renewed and any term that is varied after 9 November 2023. The changes impact many businesses who previously were not caught by the UCT regime, and introduces significant penalties for non-compliance.
Property developers using standard form contracts should be on notice to take the UCT laws seriously and to ensure all standard form contracts are reviewed and updated.
The UCT laws apply to terms which are found to be unfair in contracts, which are either a consumer contract or small business contract and is a 'standard form contract’.
A contract is a ‘standard form contract’ where, in broad terms, the contract was prepared by the party who has all or most of the bargaining power in the transaction without or before any discussion between the parties about the transaction. There is a presumption that a contract is a standard form contract, however there are several factors in determining what constitutes a standard form of contract.
Given the expansion of the meaning of ‘standard form contract’ and ‘small business’, there is an increasing risk that any number of property developers’ documents could be subject to the new UCT regime. Contracts which may be considered a ‘standard form contract’ include:
See our article here for further detail on what constitutes a standard form of contract.
A term of a consumer contract or small business contract is ‘unfair’ if it:
Examples of unfair contract terms include terms that:
It is important for property developers who rely on standard form contracts to consider which clauses are critical, and which are not required to protect the developer’s legitimate interests – as the latter may be deemed to be an unfair term and attract significant penalties.
Below is a summary of the changes made to the UCT regime. The key change to UCTs is that proposing, applying or relying on UCTs will be expressly prohibited.
| Overview of changes | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Expansion of the offence | It will be an offence to:
|
| Expanded application of the UCT regime to a broader range of contracts |
|
| Introduction of pecuniary penalties for contravention of the UCT laws |
|
| Further remedies |
|
Property developers should have an experienced property development lawyer review any contract templates currently being used (where the regime applies) to ensure the contracts do not contain clauses that may be considered unfair terms under the ACL regime.
This review should include any amendments or additional terms to a standard, published form of contract template being used by developers.
Do you require assistance in conducting contract reviews? Contact our Commercial Law Team or your usual Development Team contact
Read more from The Lot - December 2023 Edition
Keep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upThe Supreme Court of NSW provides an example of the risks of the use of AI by directors in their governance.
ADM transparency obligations that will commence on 10 December 2026 under Australian Privacy Principle 1.
The Federal Court has recently made serious findings of unlawful conduct against two different businesses.
Recent changes could expose property developments across metropolitan Melbourne to new infrastructure levies.