Melanie Olynyk
Melanie acts for government clients in public and administrative law, with a particular expertise in freedom of information (FOI) and privacy.
View profileWe share our insights from the latest Notifiable Data Breaches Report (Report) released by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC). Our analysis uncovers key statistics shaping the data breach landscape.

Twice per year the OAIC reports on statistics and key learnings gathered from the eligible data breach notifications received under the Commonwealth Notifiable Data Breach Scheme (Scheme) during the previous 6 month period. The Report assists agencies and organisations (APP entities) which are subject to the Scheme to better understand current trends and privacy risks across the data breach landscape.
The latest Report covers notifications made to the OAIC from July 2023 – December 2023.
We summarise the key statistics identified in the latest Report, as well as some key takeaways for Victorian government agencies and councils.
Some of the key privacy issues identified in the Report are extracted below.
The greater the amount of personal information an entity holds, the greater the potential scale and complexity of a data breach. APP entities should ensure they have systems and processes in place to regularly review the personal information that they hold and consider whether it is still necessary to retain that personal information. Having a data retention policy that is regularly audited and updated, and is operationalised, is critically important.
Compromised account credentials caused 25% of all data breaches in the reporting period, and ensuring the security of personal information has been identified by the OAIC as a regulatory priority.
The OAIC has strongly encouraged APP entities to uplift their access security and ICT security measures, including through implementing the Essential Eight cyber security strategies, multi-factor authentication, implementation of strong passphrases.
A significant data breach risk has been identified arising from sharing personal information to contracted service providers (e.g. cloud or software providers). The OAIC recommends mitigating this risk in contractual arrangements with third party service providers.
The OAIC has re-emphasised its expectation that APP entities must have an effective data breach response plan in place.
It expects all APP entities to have an up‑to‑date data breach response plan and notes that the following gaps have been specifically identified in recent determinations:
Identification timeframes: The faster a breach is detected, the faster an APP entity can contain and limit its impact. During the reporting period, 64% of breaches were identified within 10 days of the breach occurring.
Assessment and Notification timeframes: The obligation to assess an incident may be triggered before all the facts of the incident are known. Similarly the obligation to notify may be triggered before all the facts of the incident are known. Early assessment is recommended to ensure timely notification to the OAIC and affected individuals.
Importantly, the Report identifies that 28% of notifications to the OAIC did not occur within the 30 day timeframe.
A key objective of the Scheme is to ensure individuals are promptly notified so they can quickly take steps to minimise their risk of harm. Effective actions identified by the OAIC include quickly putting steps in place to prevent further harm arising from a breach, and making improvements to security practices.
APP entities should only notify individuals via their website where it is not practicable to notify individuals directly. Where this is the case, the website notification must include all the content required to be included within notifications to individuals.
The OAIC has highlighted that APP entities may have multiple data breach reporting obligations.
The Australian Government is implementing measures to streamline the existing regulatory frameworks, including via the establishment of a National Office for Cyber Security.
While the Report relates to APP entities who are subject to the Scheme, there are still some key takeaways for Victorian government entities and councils more generally.
Key Tips:
In our experience, good data hygiene practices will always lie at the core of best practice when it comes to data breach readiness and response.
Compliance ‘basics’, such as developing and operationalising policies and procedures for data handling, implementing and testing your data breach response plan, and supplementing these steps with regular staff training, can be fundamental to success in the event of a breach.
The Office of the Victorian Information Commissioner provides resources to Victorian government agencies on reporting, and responding to, data breaches. It also has guidance notes on two particular key risk areas, namely inadvertent disclosure when sending emails and phishing attacks.
Stay informed by subscribing to our Privacy, Data & Information team updates.
Melanie acts for government clients in public and administrative law, with a particular expertise in freedom of information (FOI) and privacy.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upWe explore in detail the key issues that developers may face going down this route.
Agencies subject to Privacy Act and APP must update their privacy policies to include information on their use of ADM
Organisations must update their privacy policies to include information on their use of automated decision-making.
Practical guidance for HR, safety and employment law professionals on using AI responsibly while managing legal risks.
Partner
Melbourne