Angela Wood
Angela is well known as a leading expert in commercial and regulatory matters in the healthcare sector, with over 20 years' experience advising health, aged care, medical device and not-for-profit providers.
View profileWe provide an update on the mandatory COVID-19 vaccination frameworks in residential aged care
Since our last update on the mandatory COVID-19 vaccination requirements in residential aged care (RAC), the requirements have commenced across all states and territories, restricting the entry into a RAC facility to RAC workers (whether they are employees, contractors or agency staff) who have been vaccinated against COVID-19. As at 15 November 2021, the Department of Health reported that 99.8% of RAC workers nationally have received their first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine and 96.9% are fully vaccinated.
On 5 November 2021, a national framework for mandatory COVID-19 vaccination requirements was also recommended for in-home and community aged care workers, with a 30 November 2021 deadline for the first dose and 31 December 2021 deadline for the second dose. However, before this recommendation, five out of eight of the Australian states and territories had already introduced such vaccination requirements, with the remaining following suit after the recommendation.
We have made the following observations while assisting aged care providers manage their obligations under the public health orders and directions:
Although the mandatory vaccination frameworks were agreed at a national level, the states and territories are responsible for making and enforcing the relevant public health orders and directions within their jurisdictions. The consequence is that there is variability in the scope of the requirements across the states and territories.
Examples of different approaches:
Organisations are required to be aware of the way the mandatory COVID-19 vaccination requirements interact with other public health orders or directions.
Moreover, a worker who is not within the scope of one particular public health order or direction, may fall within the scope of another public health order or direction. For example, a worker may not be a ‘RAC facility worker’ for the purposes of the mandate on vaccines for RAC, but their relevant state or territory may have mandates for health workers generally.
While individuals are personally responsible for complying with the vaccination requirements that are applicable to them, organisations are ultimately responsible for ensuring their workers comply and for restricting entry of unvaccinated persons onto their premises. The Public Health Orders and directions consistently state that organisations must take all reasonable steps to ensure compliance.
The obligation for RAC, in-home and community care providers to record their workforce COVID-19 vaccination status and report weekly on the de-identified data to the Australian Government Department of Health, continues to apply. The Accountability Principles 2014 and Records Principles 2014 have been amended to:
To read more about the recording and reporting requirements, see our previous articles (here and here).
Because the COVID-19 vaccination requirements involve complex public health, privacy and employment issues, we have recommended that organisations (in and outside the healthcare sector) implement steps to ensure that their systems and processes for notifying staff and collecting, storing and keeping health information, comply with legal requirements, including:
Angela is well known as a leading expert in commercial and regulatory matters in the healthcare sector, with over 20 years' experience advising health, aged care, medical device and not-for-profit providers.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upThis case will have real consequences for how companies communicate product and pricing changes to Australian consumers.
The ACCC responds to the growing use and safety issues arising from the use of these products.
OAIC determinations clarify privacy obligations for organisations using tracking pixels.
Participation requires much more than a legal response.
Partner
Sydney