Angela Wood
Angela is well known as a leading expert in commercial and regulatory matters in the healthcare sector, with over 20 years' experience advising health, aged care, medical device and not-for-profit providers.
View profileWe outline proposed good governance reforms to the Aged Care Act 1997 and the Aged Care Quality and Safety Act 2018 following the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety
The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety (Royal Commission) made several recommendations in its Final Report, Care, Dignity and Respect (Final Report), which focussed on the importance of good governance arrangements and their connection with a providers ability to deliver high-quality care for consumers.[1]
The Aged Care and other Legislation Amendment (Royal Commission Response No.2) Bill 2021 (Bill) was introduced on 1 September 2021. The Bill has been structured into eight separate schedules and proposes changes to legislation which aligns with the Recommendations of the Royal Commission.
In this article we focus on Schedule 5 of the Bill, which is intended to commence on 1 March 2022, and includes proposed amendments to the Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) and the Aged Care Quality and Safety Act 2018 (Cth) (ACQSC Act) with a view to:
Providers should ensure they are aware of and can comply with their obligations come 1 March 2022, as failure by aged care providers or key personnel to comply with governance responsibilities may attract sanctions and or civil penalties for both individuals and corporations.
In its Final Report, the Royal Commission made the following Recommendations which focussed on provider governance:
| Recommendation 88 | Legislative amendments to improve provider governance |
| Recommendation 89 | Leadership responsibilities and accountabilities[2] |
| Recommendation 90 | New Governance Standard |
| Recommendation 91 | Program of assistance to improve governance arrangements |
For a detailed discussion on the above Recommendations, take a look at our podcast: The Future of Aged Care - Provider Governance Podcast.
Schedule 5 of the Bill introduces changes to existing and new governance responsibilities for approved providers in relation to:
These measures are aimed at improving transparency and accountability and ensuring the focus of approved providers, from the top down, is on the best interests of care recipients.[3]
Responsibilities
The Bill introduces new responsibilities for approved providers for the suitability of their key personnel, including:
The current ‘disqualified individual’ definition and provisions will be replaced with a suitability test for key personnel.
Suitability Matters
The Bill introduces a new section 8C in the ACQSC Act, which outlines the meaning of ‘suitability matter’ for a person and includes consideration of a person’s experience and whether:
Notification obligations
The timeframe to notify the ACQSC of changes to the suitability of key personnel has been reduced from 28 days to 14 days, and:
Governing body of an approved provider
Schedule 1 of the Bill defines a governing body as:
Responsibilities
The Bill will also introduce specific responsibilities for an approved provider where:
to ensure that the constitution does not authorise a director of the provider to act in good faith in the best interests of the holding company that does not have any responsibilities under the aged care laws.
Membership
New responsibilities for approved providers will be introduced for governing bodies, which require approved providers to:
These responsibilities do not apply if a provider’s governing body has fewer than five members and the provider provides aged care through one or more aged care services to fewer than 40 care recipients.
Similarly, an approved provider may apply for a determination that these obligations do not apply.
If an exemption is granted, the ACQSC may make a decision on its own initiative at any time to vary or revoke the exemption.
Advisory Bodies
The Bill introduces new responsibilities requiring providers to:
Requirements
Under the proposed amendments, the governing body of an approved provider must:
The Bill introduces new reporting requirements for approved providers to:
A ‘reporting period’ is the period of 12 months starting on 1 July of a year. This means the first annual statement of an approved provider must be prepared for the reporting period beginning on or after 1 July 2022.
The annual statement obligations have been introduced with a view to help care recipients and their families understand key details of and compare providers.
Schedule 5 of the Bill highlights for providers that an increased focus will be placed on provider governance and the provision of safe and quality care and that an organisations’ culture and governance is expected to be designed around this purpose.
[1] Including but not limited to: the Australian Securities and Investments Commission; the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission; the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority; the Australian Crime Commission; AUSTRAC; or an equivalent State or Territory body; another body established for a public purpose by or under a law of the Commonwealth; or a local government authority.
[2] Recommendations 88,90 and 91 were proposed by both Commissioners and Recommendation 89 was proposed by Commissioner Briggs alone.
[3] Explanatory Memorandum, Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment (Royal Commission Response No. 2) Bill 2021, 84.
[4] Volume 1: Final Report Summary and recommendations at pages 265-268.
Angela is well known as a leading expert in commercial and regulatory matters in the healthcare sector, with over 20 years' experience advising health, aged care, medical device and not-for-profit providers.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upThis case will have real consequences for how companies communicate product and pricing changes to Australian consumers.
The ACCC responds to the growing use and safety issues arising from the use of these products.
OAIC determinations clarify privacy obligations for organisations using tracking pixels.
Participation requires much more than a legal response.
Partner
Sydney