Terry Montebello
Terry is a Law Institute of Victoria accredited expert in the areas of environment land and planning law and local government law.
View profile
A suite of new planning controls has been approved in recent times. This includes:
These controls are designed specifically to both boost the provision of housing and increase the density of housing in and around activity centres and other redevelopment precincts. There is, of course, nothing to stop the zones being used in other places.
We will now take a closer look at the new controls and share some comments and observations in relation to all three.
The key features of the Housing Choice and Transport Zone (HCTZ) are as follows:
The purposes of the HCTZ are:
Some observations
First, given the clear purposes one would think that you would need to be careful where the zone is applied. For example, a zone that actively encourages increased densities around activity centres and an increased scale of housing would be more than a challenge for an area within a Heritage Overlay. Yet, it seems that the HCTZ has been applied over large areas that have outstanding heritage qualities. It remains to be seen whether this is appropriate. It will certainly make for interesting applications and potentially considerable debates between councils and developers.
Secondly, the Maximum Building Height / Number of Storeys is dependent on whether you are located in HCTZ 1 or HCTZ 2 and lot size. HCTZ1 is essentially 4 storeys or 6 storeys on a large site and HCTZ is essentially 3 storeys or 4 storeys on a large site (1200 sq metres or greater). The recently remodelled townhouse code is called up under clause 55, while for buildings over 5 storeys clause 58 standards apply.
Thirdly, subdivision is exempt from 3rd party participation.
Lastly, like the current Residential Growth Zone, some commercial uses (shop and offices) are permitted inside the zone if the site is within 100 meres of a commercial or mixed use zone. This has the potential to provide for a leaching of the commercial activities into the residential areas.
There are 5 key features of the Precinct Zone (PRZ):
The purposes show the PRZ to be a powerful zone designed to bring about substantial change to built form. The purposes include:
Some observations
First, a necessary development framework plan and a role statement which each provide guidance as to the extent of change suggests that there is a built form framework or a structure plan for the centre that has informed the development framework. Secondly, it is noted that the PRZ rolls up a “DPO type” provision to enable master planning of any part of the area in the zone. The masterplan will then guide the way that that area may be developed.
Thirdly, the PRZ, like the Urban Growth Zone, uses applied zones. That is, by reference to either the development framework plan or another plan, different VPP zones can be called up, including for example, the Commercial 1 or 2 zones, or the Mixed Use Zone. Alternatively, a table within the PRZ allows the draftsperson to draft specific table of uses for all or part of the area in the zone. This enables the zone to be tailored to the specific needs of the area perhaps informed by a structure plan.
Lastly, the PRZ enables a Public Benefit Uplift Framework. A separate Public Benefit Uplift Framework document where one has been prepared, is given effect by the PRZ. This is a new feature which will be unfamiliar to many planners. It essentially enables built form metrics in the PRZ, or elsewhere, to be exceeded in return for a public benefit of an equivalent value to the value of the built form uplift which is sought. It will require valuations of the uplift and the public benefits to be agreed and then documented to ensure the public benefit endures.
Public benefits at this early stage have been identified as affordable housing, public realm improvements, open space and (interestingly) strategic land uses. Strategic land uses may be office or some specific type of innovation floor space such as health or research and development. The floor space itself is seen as the public benefit so developers are able to exceed built form metrics by simply delivering this type of floor space.
The Built Form Overlay (BFO) is essentially a Design and Development Overlay (DDO) on steroids and with some toppings.
The key features are:
Again, the purposes are powerful and include:
Some observations
First, like the PRZ, the BFO includes some “toppings” – namely the ability to require a masterplan and the ability to activate a Public Benefit Uplift Framework.
Secondly, one of the intended functions of the BFO is to standardize built form provisions across Melbourne’s activity centres so that irrespective of which municipality you are in, built form standards are drafted in the same way and with the same considerations; generally the only difference is the metric.
Lastly, the BFO identifies 15 built form elements which each contain an outcome and one or more standards. In somewhat familiar language, development:
The innovation is that the BFO can also identify deemed to comply standards, and where it does, if complied with, it is deemed to meet the corresponding outcome for that standard.
| BFO1 Building Typology and future character |
| BFO2 Building Heights |
| BFO3 Floor Area Ratios |
| BFO4 Overshadowing of open space and public realm |
| BFO5 Front setbacks street wall heights setbacks above the street wall and landscaped setbacks |
| BFO6 Side and rear setbacks and building separation within a site |
| BFO7 Building layout and adaptability |
| BFO8 Wind effect on the public realm |
| BFO9 Active Frontages |
| BFO10 Pedestrian connections |
| BFO11 Weather protection |
| BFO12 Landscaping and fencing |
| BFO13 Car parking |
| BFO14 Buildings and services |
| BFO15 Exterior Design |
Importantly, the Built Form Standards may be modified by a schedule and the schedule can determine which standards are to be deemed to comply.
The new zones and built form controls are part of the housing reform process and will certainly shake up the way that planning is undertaken. Currently, the only centres to use the BFO are those being planned by the SRLA. The PRZ is also proposed to be applied to the SRLA precincts, as well as other ‘priority precincts’. For the 10 activity centres, apart from the use of the HCTZ, planning looks to be mostly done by the Activity Centre Zone or the standard zones and the DDO. Look for that to change in the near future so that the BFO will be the primary tool for regulating built form given the aims of achieving standardization.
Councils will also need to come to grips with Floor Area Ratios (FARs) becoming much more common in built form controls. Where used, care will need to be taken to ensure that FARs are bedded down for those parts of the site (at ground level and above) that the built form has not covered. This will generally need to be done by a section 173 agreement.
With the Public Benefit Uplift Scheme, there is an opportunity to leverage off uplift where that is consistent with other built form outcomes such as overshadowing. All of a sudden “mandatory” is not such a dirty word. Public benefit uplift schemes only work where certain built form controls are mandatory and may only be exceeded by agreement.
Get in touch with our Planning experts.
Terry is a Law Institute of Victoria accredited expert in the areas of environment land and planning law and local government law.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign up
Partner
Melbourne