Meredith Kennedy
Meredith loves working with her clients to navigate a path through complex areas of law and delicate employment situations.
View profileIn 2020, the Victorian government undertook a process of consultation regarding the operation of the Long Service Benefits Portability Interim Regulations 2019. In particular, questions regarding the scope and interpretation of regulations addressing the following issues were raised:
The new Long Service Benefits Portability Regulations 2020 (Regulations) seek to address some of the potential issues identified in feedback from employers and stakeholders about the Interim Regulations by introducing new definitions, removing the predominance test for employers and employees, and creating a new test linked to modern award coverage (awards can still cover employees even when an enterprise agreement applies to them).
In order to be covered by the Scheme, the Regulations now require that workers must:
The new Regulations remove the predominance test for employers (which sought to determine whether or not an employer was primarily engaged in community service work) and provides that an employer in the community services sector is:
Prescribed employers now include community health centres and women’s health services.
Community service work refers to work which is performed in Victoria[1] and includes a wide range of services set out in both the Long Service Benefits Portability Act 2018 (Vic) (LSBP Act) and the Regulations. The Regulations now specify that community service work also includes:
A number of submissions called for revision of the double-dipping regulations which currently apply only when workers have an entitlement to long service leave under the Scheme as well as a Fair Work Instrument (such as an enterprise agreement). For example, some submissions sought an extension of the double-dipping provisions to the Long Service Leave Act 2018 (Vic) (LSL Act) so that employers are not required to pay both a levy to the Portable Long Service Authority on behalf of a worker and pay the same worker for a long service entitlement under the LSL Act for the same period of service without reimbursement from the Authority.
As this amendment would require changes to the LSPB Act, it was outside the scope of the review of the Regulations. However, this issue has been recognised as having potentially significant impacts on employers. A review of the LSBP Act is due to occur on 1 July 2022 and we anticipate that this matter, as well as other matters regarding reimbursement of the levy,[2]
will be raised for further consideration at that stage.
[1] The Act also allows for reciprocal agreements with other States and Territories. However, at this stage, the Minister has not entered into formal agreements. The Australian Capital Territory and Queensland are at this time the only other jurisdictions which include the community services sector in portable long service schemes.
[2] For example, submissions were made that the levy should be reimbursed in respect of workers who leave the community services sector without qualifying for a long service benefit or who become ineligible after previously being eligible under the LSBP Act.
Please contact a member of our Employment, Safety & People Team.
Meredith loves working with her clients to navigate a path through complex areas of law and delicate employment situations.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upChanges to employment arrangements for Council CEOs and the framework provided for the Local Government Fair Jobs Code.
Victoria steps towards becoming the first Australian jurisdiction to legislate a statutory right to work from home.
Gender-based undervaluation changes to the SCHADS and HPSS Awards: key dates and actions for NFP employers
Regarding the Road Transport Contractual Chain Order – Fuel Cost Recovery 2026, the Fair Work Commission published...
Partner
Melbourne