Will we see more liquidators using SOPA after Seymour Whyte?
The NSW Court of Appeal declined to follow the Victorian Court of Appeal on a key issue of security of payment legislation.
Earlier this year (and not for the first time in the Australian security of payment landscape) an intermediate appellate Court in one Australian State reached a different position on materially identical provisions in the security of payment scheme to that reached by the appellate Court in another State.
In Seymour Whyte Constructions Pty Ltd v Ostwald Bros Pty Ltd (in Liquidation)  NSWCA 11, the NSW Court of Appeal declined to follow the Victorian Court of Appeal’s decision in Façade Treatment Engineering Pty Ltd (in liq) v Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd  VSCA 247 on a key issue of security of payment legislation, with the NSW Court of Appeal holding that in NSW, key security of payment processes can be initiated (at least) by a claimant in liquidation.
New Bill promising to shake up infrastructure contributions in NSW
The Bill amends or replaces many of the existing provisions contained in Part 7 of the EP&A Act.
Time Permitting: limitation periods for ‘building actions’ under the Building Act
On 10 June 2021, Justice Forbes handed down a decision which provides clarity on how a limitation period is to be...
Streamlining and Standards: The proposed amendments to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
By Samantha Murphy
We examine the proposed changes and how the bills interact