Following the right road
By Mark Hayes• 08 August 2017 • 1 min read
Victorian Supreme Court decision highlights importance of adopting the right procedure when making a decision about the future of a road
A decision handed down by the Victorian Supreme Court on 27 July - Pulitano Pastoral Pty Ltd v Mansfield Shire Council – highlights the critical importance of adopting the right procedure when making a decision about the future of a road.
In that case, a decision to remove a road from a Road Register was successfully challenged on the ground that the Resolution did not demonstrate that the council had formed the requisite opinion under the Road Management Act 2004. The Resolution was also legally defective because of a failure to afford natural justice to the owner of land abutting the road.
Similarly, a subsequent decision to discontinue the road was quashed. This was because the Resolution initiating the procedure for discontinuance wrongly suggested that the council had already formed the opinion that the road was no longer reasonably required as a road.
Not every decision relating to a road will be as contentious. There are, however, valuable lessons about the procedure (and the form of Resolution necessary) that councils would do well to heed.
Application of the Environmental Audit Overlay to a subdivided building
By Kierra Parker & Josh Montebello
This article explains how to interpret and apply the Environmental Audit Overlay (EAO)
Amendment VC179 - facilitating recovery of bushfire damaged areas
By Kierra Parker & Georgia de Castella
This article explains the amendments to the VC179 and how they act to assist in bushfire recovery
COVID-19 Omnibus (Emergency Measures) Act 2020 – Significant matters for Local Government, Planning and Environment
Changes for Local Government, Planning and Environment introduced by the COVID-19 Omnibus (Emergency Measures) Act 2020