Following the right road
Victorian Supreme Court decision highlights importance of adopting the right procedure when making a decision about the future of a road
A decision handed down by the Victorian Supreme Court on 27 July - Pulitano Pastoral Pty Ltd v Mansfield Shire Council – highlights the critical importance of adopting the right procedure when making a decision about the future of a road.
In that case, a decision to remove a road from a Road Register was successfully challenged on the ground that the Resolution did not demonstrate that the council had formed the requisite opinion under the Road Management Act 2004. The Resolution was also legally defective because of a failure to afford natural justice to the owner of land abutting the road.
Similarly, a subsequent decision to discontinue the road was quashed. This was because the Resolution initiating the procedure for discontinuance wrongly suggested that the council had already formed the opinion that the road was no longer reasonably required as a road.
Not every decision relating to a road will be as contentious. There are, however, valuable lessons about the procedure (and the form of Resolution necessary) that councils would do well to heed.
New point of law: What can be considered as a protected document?
A look at Environment Protection Authority v Sydney Water Corporation  NSWLEC 119.
Society of University Lawyers Conference 2023
Maddocks is a proud platinum sponsor of the Society of University Lawyers Conference 2023.
Implementation of Universities Accord Interim Recommendations passed
On 19 October 2023 the Senate passed a slightly amended version of the Higher Education Support Amendment
Preparing for mandatory data breach notification under NSW privacy laws: Five key actions
By Ooma Khurana & Radhika Bhatia
This is the second instalment in our For Your Information campaign