Catherine Dunlop
Catherine is one of Australia's leading lawyers working with clients on work health and safety (WHS), behavioural investigations and inquests, inquiries and Royal Commissions.
View profile
The landscape of legislation and ‘best practice’ in how employers handle psychosocial hazards and risks is something we expect will evolve over the next few years.
However, right now employers should be looking critically at managing hazards and risks in their business by:
In 2018, the Boland Report recommended that the Model Work Health and Safety (WHS) Act be amended to include specific provisions about:
Four years on, New South Wales was the first state to amend its WHS laws on 1 October 2022 to introduce a positive duty for a person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) to manage psychosocial risks in the workplace. Queensland has taken a similar approach with amendments to its WHS laws about managing psychosocial risks to commence on 1 April 2023. Western Australia has introduced a non-mandatory code of practice.
While yet to be drafted, proposed changes in Victoria are likely to go much further than in NSW and Queensland, with a requirement to have a range of psychosocial prevention plans in place for certain hazards and a requirement to report certain psychosocial complaints (bullying, sexual harassment and exposure to occupational violence) received to WorkSafe Victoria twice yearly. The Health and Work Safety Authorities (representing the heads of Australian safety regulators) are currently working on a reporting scheme for the jurisdictions (all except Victoria) who have adopted the model WHS laws.
These changes highlight the need to have a proactive rather than a reactive approach to managing psychosocial risks before they arise.
A psychosocial hazard is one that arises from the design, management, environment, plant or interactions at work, that may increase the risk of work-related stress which can then lead to psychological or physical harm.A psychoso cial risk is a risk to the health or safety of a person from a psychosocial hazard.
Common psychological hazards include:
These hazards can accumulate and interact, compounding the risk of harm, for example, if there is bullying and poor organisational justice or if workers who are exposed to traumatic content are working extremely long hours (where the latter can increase the risk of harm arising from vicarious trauma).
The law requires employers to take a proactive approach to implementing control measures to eliminate, or minimise (if elimination isn’t reasonably practicable), psychosocial risks so far as is reasonably practicable.
The law does not require employers to take on the role of a psychologist – rather, it requires a consideration of the reasonable measures that can be taken to identify risk and implement effective control measures.
We identified in the opening of this article those items employers should be looking critically at.
However, employers should be mindful that in Queensland, and likely in Victoria there is a new hierarchy of control for addressing psychosocial hazards. Reliance on training, instruction and EAP will not be sufficient unless the employer has first consulted with workers and considered job design and adjustments to work and work systems to eliminate risk.
This will likely require employers to do more than they may currently be doing to consider these hazards, with the Victorian regulatory impact statement for the draft regulations estimating costs of many thousands for employers in the first year of implementation.
Indicators from all relevant regulators are that they will initially be taking an educative and capacity building approach to assist organisations with compliance. There is useful material available on the respective regulators’ websites and on the Safe Work Australia website. Organisations should monitor this material as it will be very useful in informing preventative strategies.
In 2023, we will keep you updated and assist you to navigate through the legislative changes to ensure that you are well placed, not only from a compliance perspective, but also in building and maintaining mentally healthy workplaces.
Catherine is one of Australia's leading lawyers working with clients on work health and safety (WHS), behavioural investigations and inquests, inquiries and Royal Commissions.
View profileOne of Australia's leading employment and industrial relations litigators, Bruce has extensive experience advising clients in multiple industries.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upChanges to employment arrangements for Council CEOs and the framework provided for the Local Government Fair Jobs Code.
Victoria steps towards becoming the first Australian jurisdiction to legislate a statutory right to work from home.
Gender-based undervaluation changes to the SCHADS and HPSS Awards: key dates and actions for NFP employers
Regarding the Road Transport Contractual Chain Order – Fuel Cost Recovery 2026, the Fair Work Commission published...
Partner
Melbourne