Environmental liabilities for insolvency practitioners – amendments to the Environment Protection Act 2017 to reinforce personal liability

On 6 September 2022, amendments to the Environment Protection Act 2017 (Vic) (EPA) were made, reinforcing the potential personal liability for insolvency practitioners for environmental clean-up costs. The amendments follow the recent decision in The Australian Sawmilling Company Pty Ltd (in liq) & Ors v EPA & Anor [2021] VSCA 294.
Section 297 allows the Environment Protection Authority (Authority) to recover reasonable costs incurred by the Authority including when taking any prescribed action such as cleaning up contaminated sites. Section 297(2)(a) allows the Authority to recover these costs from ‘the owner or occupier of the premises where the circumstances exist'. The new section 297(5) provides that the section will apply ‘despite anything to the contrary in Chapter 5 of the Corporations Act’.
While the amendments are yet to be tested, their purpose is to elevate section 297 above the Corporations Act and ensure that liquidators cannot use disclaimers to avoid hefty environmental costs, even if an indemnity has not been provided. The practical consequence will be that clean-up costs must be paid in priority to other unsecured claims and priority costs, including a liquidator’s remuneration.
Insolvency practitioners should be aware that the amendments are aimed at preventing liquidators from disclaiming liability for environmental clean-up costs and liquidators should consider potential environmental clean-up costs before accepting any appointment.
Read more articles from The Annual Return: 2022 in Review.
Cara Thompson
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upRecent articles
Watchdog Podcast | “You have definitely won!”: Marketing claims, consumers and the MagnaMail decision
When does promotional language cross the line into misleading conduct?
Court indicates directors breached their duties after relying on AI for legal strategy and advice
The Supreme Court of NSW provides an example of the risks of the use of AI by directors in their governance.
Ten weeks to go: OAIC releases guidance on new automated decision-making transparency obligations under APP 1
ADM transparency obligations that will commence on 10 December 2026 under Australian Privacy Principle 1.
Unconscionable by design: the Federal Court delivers two scathing judgments on dishonest and manipulative business practices
The Federal Court has recently made serious findings of unlawful conduct against two different businesses.
Partner
Melbourne