New South Wales Supreme Court clarifies priority of claims over R&D tax refunds between employees and secured creditors

In a decision handed down by Black J on 25 March 2022, the New South Wales Supreme Court provided useful guidance on the order of priority of payments in a winding up where employee debts and secured creditor claims exist: In the matter of Spitfire Corporation Limited (in liquidation) and Aspirio Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2022] NSWSC 340.
Research and development tax refunds (R&D Refunds) fall within the definition of an 'account' and are, therefore a circulating asset pursuant to s 340(1) of the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (PPSA). Consequently, and upon the assessment of the company’s property available to pay creditors (other than secured creditors), s 561 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) was enlivened and the R&D Refunds were to be paid to employees in priority to the secured creditor.
In a corporate group context, appointing a shell company with no assets as the formal ”employer of record” cannot be used as a means of undermining employee claims for payment ahead of a secured creditor under s 561 of the Act. A ‘true employer’ analysis will be used when ascertaining who is an employee under s 556(2) of the Act.
Read the original article on ARITA:
New South Wales Supreme Court clarifies priority of claims over R&D tax refunds between employees and secured creditors
Read more articles from The Annual Return: 2022 in Review.
Keep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upRecent articles
Watchdog Podcast | “You have definitely won!”: Marketing claims, consumers and the MagnaMail decision
When does promotional language cross the line into misleading conduct?
Court indicates directors breached their duties after relying on AI for legal strategy and advice
The Supreme Court of NSW provides an example of the risks of the use of AI by directors in their governance.
Ten weeks to go: OAIC releases guidance on new automated decision-making transparency obligations under APP 1
ADM transparency obligations that will commence on 10 December 2026 under Australian Privacy Principle 1.
Unconscionable by design: the Federal Court delivers two scathing judgments on dishonest and manipulative business practices
The Federal Court has recently made serious findings of unlawful conduct against two different businesses.
Partner
Melbourne