New South Wales Supreme Court clarifies priority of claims over R&D tax refunds between employees and secured creditors

In a decision handed down by Black J on 25 March 2022, the New South Wales Supreme Court provided useful guidance on the order of priority of payments in a winding up where employee debts and secured creditor claims exist: In the matter of Spitfire Corporation Limited (in liquidation) and Aspirio Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2022] NSWSC 340.
Research and development tax refunds (R&D Refunds) fall within the definition of an 'account' and are, therefore a circulating asset pursuant to s 340(1) of the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (PPSA). Consequently, and upon the assessment of the company’s property available to pay creditors (other than secured creditors), s 561 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) was enlivened and the R&D Refunds were to be paid to employees in priority to the secured creditor.
In a corporate group context, appointing a shell company with no assets as the formal ”employer of record” cannot be used as a means of undermining employee claims for payment ahead of a secured creditor under s 561 of the Act. A ‘true employer’ analysis will be used when ascertaining who is an employee under s 556(2) of the Act.
Read the original article on ARITA:
New South Wales Supreme Court clarifies priority of claims over R&D tax refunds between employees and secured creditors
Read more articles from The Annual Return: 2022 in Review.
Keep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upRecent articles
Watchdog Podcast | ACCC v Coles and the future of was-now pricing
We unpack recent findings and explore implications for retailers and businesses running promotional pricing campaigns.
Swiped right on deception: eHarmony's bad date with the Federal Court
The Federal Court found eHarmony engaged in widespread misleading and deceptive conduct in breach of the ACL.
Government Procurement Best Practice: 10 tips to plan, govern and deliver better procurement outcomes
Practical steps to strengthen procurement planning, improve market engagement and deliver competitive processes.
Technology Procurement Refresher: Effective service level regimes
Service levels are a familiar feature of technology contracts, yet their practical application is not always clear.
Partner
Melbourne