Coming soon: significant legislative changes to unfair contract term regime — are you ready?
On 9 November 2023, the amendments to the laws governing unfair contract terms (UCT) come into effect. The changes impact many businesses who previously were not caught by the UCT regime, and introduces significant penalties for non-compliance. All businesses using standard form contracts should be on notice to take the UCT laws seriously and to review and update their standard form contracts ahead of the forthcoming changes.
Therefore it is important for when businesses are preparing or using reviewing agreements that could be standard form contracts to which the provisions apply for us to be very conscious of creating liability for your business.
Application of the UCT laws
The UCT laws apply to terms which are found to be unfair in contracts which are either a consumer contract or small business contract and is a standard form contract.
A contract is a ‘standard form contract’ where, in broad terms, the contract was prepared by the party who has all or most of the bargaining power in the transaction without or before any discussion between the parties about the transaction. There is a presumption that a contract is a standard form contract.
The changes clarify that contracts may be determined to be a ‘standard form contract’ despite there being an opportunity for:
- a party to negotiate minor or insubstantial changes;
- a party to select a term from a range of options for such term; or
- the parties to meaningfully negotiate the terms of another contract, but not meaningfully negotiate the terms of the contract in question.
Section 24 of the Australian Consumer Law sets out that a term of a consumer contract or small business contract is ‘unfair’ if it:
- would cause a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations arising under the contract; and
- is not reasonably necessary in order to protect the legitimate interests of the party who would be advantaged by the term; and
- would cause detriment (whether financial or otherwise) to a party if it were to be applied or relied on.
In deciding whether a term is unfair, the court will consider the contract as a whole and all the rights and responsibilities for each party under the contract, as well as whether the term is transparent.
Examples of unfair contract terms include terms that:
- allow one party (but not the other) to avoid or limit their responsibilities under the contract;
- allow one party (but not the other) to end the contract;
- penalise one party (but not the other) for breaking or ending the contract; and
- allow one party (but not the other) to change the terms or pricing under the contract.
Changes made to the UCT Regime
Below is a summary of the changes that we and our clients need to take particular note of. The key change to the UCT regime is that proposing, applying or relying on UCTs will be expressly prohibited.
Overview of changes | Detail |
---|---|
Expansion of the offence | It will be an offence to:
|
Expanded application of the UCT regime to a broader range of contracts |
|
Introduction of pecuniary penalties for contravention of the UCT laws |
|
Further remedies |
|
With respect to timing, whilst the UCT Reform Bill came into effect on 10 November 2022, the changes to the UCT regime will not be effective until 9 November 2023 (including with respect to any penalties in connection with the use or enforcement of UCTs) and do not apply retrospectively to existing contracts (i.e., those contracts already executed prior to 9 November 2023). That is, it applies to new contracts made at or after 9 November 2023, including any contracts which are renewed and any term that is varied after 9 November 2023.
It is also worth noting that the increase in penalties with respect to contraventions under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
(other than in connection with the use and enforcement of the UCTs) became effective on 10 November 2022.
Reviewing standard form contracts?
Should you need any assistance in reviewing any standard form contracts or have any questions in respect of the reform, please reach out to your relationship partner or contact us.
Keep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upRecent articles
The LiveBetter case: $1.8m civil penalty for NDIS provider
We unpack the learnings from LiveBetter’s $1.8m civil penalty following the death of an NDIS participant
Breaking down the dose – examining the advertisement of weight loss medicines
We explore the TGA’s approach to the surge in weight loss medications such as Ozempic
Hack to the future: your plan to navigate Australia's new Cyber Security Legislative Package
The Parliament passed the Australian Government’s package of legislation.
Breaking down the dose – understanding the laws regulating advertising medicines in Australia
With changes in regulatory activity by the TGA, we summarise the frameworks that apply to advertising medicines
Special Counsel
Melbourne