Jeff Goodall
Jeff has deep expertise and extensive experience advising corporate and government clients on a broad range of complex technology and general commercial transactions.
View profileA progress update on the security of critical infrastructure reforms.
On Monday, Parliament passed the Security Legislation Amendment (Critical Infrastructure) Bill 2021 (Cth) (the Bill) (formerly cited as the Security Legislation Amendment (Critical Infrastructure) Bill 2020 (Cth) (the Former Bill).
The Bill amends the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (the Act) to enact urgent elements of the Former Bill, which seek to manage and address complex and evolving risks threatening Australia's critical infrastructure and national security.
Following the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security’s (the PJCIS) recommendation to split the Former Bill into two parts, non-urgent elements of the Former Bill, including positive-security obligations on the adoption, compliance and maintenance of a critical infrastructure risk management program, have been deferred for further industry and government consultation, as discussed in our recent report on the reforms.
The Bill enacts key elements of the reforms identified by the PJCIS as requiring urgent implementation, including:
A core of the Bill’s proposed amendments will commence the day after the Bill receives royal assent (which may take 7 - 10 working days).
As recommended by the PJCIS, the remaining elements of the Former Bill will be amended in consultation with the industry and reintroduced in a subsequent bill (Bill Two).
Bill Two is expected to implement measures including obligations to implement and maintain risk management programs concerning critical infrastructure, and the ability to declare Systems of National Significance (with accompanying enhanced cyber security obligations).
It has been anticipated by the PJCIS that Bill Two should proceed at a ‘more manageable pace’ for government and industry.
Associated with this recommendation, the PJCIS also recommended that Bill Two be referred back to the PJCIS when it is introduced for further review, alongside analysis of the impacts of the Bill and statutory review of the Act.
This is intended to ensure that legislative reforms concerning Australia’s critical infrastructure
…are not just a ‘set and forget’ response to a current threat.
The urgent reforms proposed in the Former Bill have now been passed, and will soon come into force. The reforms have the potential to impose a significant regulatory burden in some cases, and non-compliance will give rise to financial penalties, so it is important to be aware of the proposed changes.
We also recommend that our clients in key industry sectors continue to monitor the ongoing progress of Bill Two, and participate in any further opportunities to frame these reforms through consultation.
Meanwhile, please reach out to us if you require support in further unpacking the implications of the latest regulatory reforms in this area.
Jeff has deep expertise and extensive experience advising corporate and government clients on a broad range of complex technology and general commercial transactions.
View profileOoma provides specialist legal advice to both public and private sector clients with a focus on privacy, data protection and technology.
View profileKeep up to date with our legal insights and events
Sign upKey considerations for government procurement and project teams.
Victorian Supreme Court reinforces the importance of timely estate planning.
Software escrow is a well-established but frequently misunderstood risk mitigation mechanism in procurement contracts.
City Beach lost its appeal against the $14m penalty imposed by the Federal Court for supplying non-compliant products.
Partner
Sydney