About Us

We work collaboratively with our clients to build strong, sustainable relationships. Our team is committed to delivering consistent high standards of service, and we understand the importance of accessibility. Working with us, you'll enjoy open communication, meaning well scoped, properly resourced and effectively managed matters.

Learn More

Latest Case

Assisting on whole of government technology agreements November 2, 2017

Maddocks advised the Commonwealth Government’s Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) on its whole of government purchasing agreement with SAP. The DTA was set up in 2015 to assist government departments and agencies with digital transformation and … Continued

Latest News

Construction and Projects special counsel joins Maddocks January 17, 2018

17 January 2018 Maddocks has appointed Sefton Warner as a special counsel in the firm’s Construction and Projects team. Sefton brings to Maddocks extensive front-end construction projects experience, having worked on a number of major … Continued

Latest Article

2017: In Review – The biggest tech trends and events of the year January 17, 2018

2017 has been another frenetic and significant year for the technology sector. In keeping with Commvault and Maddocks’ joint mission to deliver you practical guidance, our end of year wrap-up highlights the most significant technology … Continued

Four-year Modern Award review: what it means for you

When the Fair Work Act was introduced in 2009, the Act brought with it an obligation on the Fair Work Commission to carry out four-yearly reviews of modern awards.

The review of the higher education modern awards, namely the Higher Education Industry Academic Staff Award 2010 and the Higher Education Industry General Staff Award 2010, has been happening for some time now and the Commission has received submissions from various parties on a range of issues.

The most significant issue for the higher education industry considered to date has been that of casual employment. It has been proposed the casual employment clause in the higher education modern awards be amended to require:

  • a minimum engagement period of four hours (up from three hours in the current awards)
  • a deeming provision that affects casual conversion rights.

It is this deeming provision that could have the most impact on how institutions engage casual employees.

Firstly, the deeming provision would reduce the service eligibility threshold for casual conversion from 12 months to six months. Secondly, instead of requiring an employer to not unreasonably refuse a casual employee’s conversion to a permanent employee, a casual employee who has worked for more than six months will automatically be deemed to be a permanent employee, and written reasons would need to be provided if conversion is rejected. The proposed model term also sets out provisions dealing with the hours of work that must be offered for non-casual employment and the recognition of prior casual service.

The Commission is yet to make a determination regarding the amendments, with a determination likely in early 2017. Any determination ultimately made by the Commission will have an impact on your institution’s next enterprise agreement. This is because before the Commission can approve an enterprise agreement, it must be satisfied that employees would be better off on an overall basis when compared to the underlying modern award. This is known as the better off overall test, or the ‘BOOT’.

If the proposed amendments are made to the casual employment clause, and your institution’s enterprise agreement does not take into account those amendments, the enterprise agreement may be found to not pass the BOOT, resulting in the need for undertakings to be given or continued negotiations.

It is therefore important you take into account any changes made to the higher education modern awards through the four-yearly review process.

When the Fair Work Act was introduced in 2009, the Act brought with it an obligation on the Fair Work Commission to carry out four-yearly reviews of modern awards.

The review of the higher education modern awards, namely the Higher Education Industry Academic Staff Award 2010 and the Higher Education Industry General Staff Award 2010, has been happening for some time now and the Commission has received submissions from various parties on a range of issues.

The most significant issue for the higher education industry considered to date has been that of casual employment. It has been proposed the casual employment clause in the higher education modern awards be amended to require:

  • a minimum engagement period of four hours (up from three hours in the current awards)
  • a deeming provision that affects casual conversion rights.

It is this deeming provision that could have the most impact on how institutions engage casual employees.

Firstly, the deeming provision would reduce the service eligibility threshold for casual conversion from 12 months to six months. Secondly, instead of requiring an employer to not unreasonably refuse a casual employee’s conversion to a permanent employee, a casual employee who has worked for more than six months will automatically be deemed to be a permanent employee, and written reasons would need to be provided if conversion is rejected. The proposed model term also sets out provisions dealing with the hours of work that must be offered for non-casual employment and the recognition of prior casual service.

The Commission is yet to make a determination regarding the amendments, with a determination likely in early 2017. Any determination ultimately made by the Commission will have an impact on your institution’s next enterprise agreement. This is because before the Commission can approve an enterprise agreement, it must be satisfied that employees would be better off on an overall basis when compared to the underlying modern award. This is known as the better off overall test, or the ‘BOOT’.

If the proposed amendments are made to the casual employment clause, and your institution’s enterprise agreement does not take into account those amendments, the enterprise agreement may be found to not pass the BOOT, resulting in the need for undertakings to be given or continued negotiations.

It is therefore important you take into account any changes made to the higher education modern awards through the four-yearly review process.